E. Declercq, R. Young, H. Cabral, and J. Ecker, Is a Rising Cesarean Delivery Rate Inevitable? Trends in Industrialized Countries, 1987 to 2007, Birth, vol.33, issue.12, pp.99-104, 1987.
DOI : 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2010.00459.x

J. Villar, G. Carroli, N. Zavaleta, A. Donner, D. Wojdyla et al., Maternal and neonatal individual risks and benefits associated with caesarean delivery: multicentre prospective study, BMJ, vol.335, issue.7628, p.3351025, 2007.
DOI : 10.1136/bmj.39363.706956.55

C. Spong, V. Berghella, K. Wenstrom, B. Mercer, and G. Saade, Preventing the first cesarean delivery: summary of a joint Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, and American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Workshop, Obstet Gynecol, vol.2012, issue.1205, pp.1181-1193

A. Betran, M. Merialdi, J. Lauer, W. Bing-shun, J. Thomas et al., Rates of caesarean section: analysis of global, regional and national estimates, Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology, vol.76, issue.2, pp.98-113, 2007.
DOI : 10.1097/00001648-199911000-00019

C. Deneux-tharaux, E. Carmona, M. Bouvier-colle, and G. Breart, Postpartum Maternal Mortality and Cesarean Delivery, Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol.108, issue.3, Part 1, pp.541-548, 2006.
DOI : 10.1097/01.AOG.0000233154.62729.24

O. Neill, S. Kearney, P. Kenny, L. Khashan, A. Henriksen et al., Caesarean delivery and subsequent stillbirth or miscarriage: systematic review and meta-analysis, PLoS One, vol.8, issue.1, p.54588, 2013.

M. Macdorman, E. Declercq, F. Menacker, and M. Malloy, Neonatal Mortality for Primary Cesarean and Vaginal Births to Low-Risk Women: Application of an "Intention-to-Treat" Model, Birth, vol.109, issue.14, pp.3-8, 2008.
DOI : 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1998.tb10176.x

S. Thavagnanam, J. Fleming, A. Bromley, M. Shields, and C. Cardwell, A meta-analysis of the association between Caesarean section and childhood asthma, Clinical & Experimental Allergy, vol.65, issue.4, pp.629-633, 2008.
DOI : 10.1016/S0272-5231(05)70006-X

C. Cardwell, L. Stene, G. Joner, O. Cinek, J. Svensson et al., Caesarean section is associated with an increased risk of childhood-onset type 1 diabetes mellitus: a meta-analysis of observational studies, Diabetologia, vol.17, issue.Suppl 1, pp.51726-735, 2008.
DOI : 10.1007/s00125-008-0941-z

. Caesarean-section and . London, UK): National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) p. (Clinical guideline, 2011.

F. Althabe, C. Sosa, J. Belizan, L. Gibbons, F. Jacquerioz et al., Cesarean Section Rates and Maternal and Neonatal Mortality in Low-, Medium-, and High-Income Countries: An Ecological Study, Birth, vol.367, issue.6, pp.270-277, 2006.
DOI : 10.1093/ije/30.6.1343

S. Katikireddi, D. Gorman, and A. Leyland, A comparison of trends in caesarean section rates in former communist (transition) countries and other European countries, The European Journal of Public Health, vol.23, issue.3, pp.381-383
DOI : 10.1093/eurpub/cks165

D. Brennan, M. Robson, M. Murphy, O. Herlihy, and C. , Comparative analysis of international cesarean delivery rates using 10-group classification identifies significant variation in spontaneous labor, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol.201, issue.3, pp.301-308, 2009.
DOI : 10.1016/j.ajog.2009.06.021

J. Zeitlin, K. Szamotulska, N. Drewniak, A. Mohangoo, J. Chalmers et al., Preterm Birth Time Trends in Europe, Obstetric Anesthesia Digest, vol.34, issue.4, pp.1356-1365
DOI : 10.1097/01.aoa.0000455581.02695.03

W. Callaghan and P. Dietz, Differences in Birth Weight for Gestational Age Distributions According to the Measures Used to Assign Gestational Age, American Journal of Epidemiology, vol.171, issue.7
DOI : 10.1093/aje/kwp468

A. Mohangoo, S. Buitendijk, K. Szamotulska, J. Chalmers, L. Irgens et al., Gestational Age Patterns of Fetal and Neonatal Mortality in Europe: Results from the Euro-Peristat Project, PLoS ONE, vol.45, issue.11, p.24727, 2011.
DOI : 10.1371/journal.pone.0024727.s003

L. Kollee, M. Cuttini, D. Delmas, E. Papiernik, A. Den-ouden et al., Obstetric interventions for babies born before 28???weeks of gestation in Europe: results of the MOSAIC study, BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, vol.118, issue.Suppl 20, pp.1161481-1491, 2009.
DOI : 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2009.02235.x

B. Blondel, A. Macfarlane, M. Gissler, G. Breart, and J. Zeitlin, General obstetrics: Preterm birth and multiple pregnancy in European countries participating in the PERISTAT project, BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, vol.188, issue.Suppl 1, pp.528-535, 2006.
DOI : 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.00923.x

I. Rio, A. Castello, C. Barona, J. M. Mas, R. Rebagliato et al., Caesarean section rates in immigrant and native women in Spain: the importance of geographical origin and type of hospital for delivery, The European Journal of Public Health, vol.20, issue.5, pp.524-529, 2010.
DOI : 10.1093/eurpub/ckq067

A. Poobalan, L. Aucott, T. Gurung, W. Smith, and S. Bhattacharya, Obesity as an independent risk factor for elective and emergency caesarean delivery in nulliparous women - systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies, Obesity Reviews, vol.91, issue.5, pp.28-35, 2009.
DOI : 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2008.00537.x

K. Parrish, V. Holt, T. Easterling, F. Connell, and J. Logerfo, Effect of Changes in Maternal Age, Parity, and Birth Weight Distribution on Primary Cesarean Delivery Rates, JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association, vol.271, issue.6, pp.443-447, 1994.
DOI : 10.1001/jama.1994.03510300049037

D. Luthy, J. Malmgren, R. Zingheim, and C. Leininger, Physician contribution to a cesarean delivery risk model, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol.188, issue.6, pp.1579-1585, 2003.
DOI : 10.1067/mob.2003.389

K. Baicker, K. Buckles, and A. Chandra, Geographic Variation In The Appropriate Use Of Cesarean Delivery, Health Affairs, vol.25, issue.5, pp.355-367
DOI : 10.1377/hlthaff.25.w355

J. Zeitlin, D. Lallo, D. Blondel, B. Weber, T. Schmidt et al., Variability in caesarean section rates for very preterm births at 28???31 weeks of gestation in 10 European regions: Results of the MOSAIC project, European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, vol.149, issue.2, pp.147-152, 2010.
DOI : 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2009.12.018

M. Habiba, M. Kaminski, M. Da-fre, K. Marsal, O. Bleker et al., Caesarean section on request: a comparison of obstetricians' attitudes in eight European countries, BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, vol.318, issue.6, pp.647-656, 2006.
DOI : 10.1016/j.jmwh.2004.05.010

K. Mcpherson, G. Gon, and M. Scott, International variations in a selected number of surgical procedures. OECD Health Working Papers, pp.15-19, 2013.

R. Stafford, The Impact of Nonclinical Factors on Repeat Cesarean Section, JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association, vol.265, issue.1, pp.59-63, 1991.
DOI : 10.1001/jama.1991.03460010059031

D. Coonrod, D. Drachman, P. Hobson, and M. Manriquez, Nulliparous term singleton vertex cesarean delivery rates: institutional and individual level predictors, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol.198, issue.6, pp.694-691, 2008.
DOI : 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.03.026

B. Blondel, E. Papiernik, D. Delmas, W. Kunzel, T. Weber et al., Organisation of obstetric services for very preterm births in Europe: results from the MOSAIC project, BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, vol.89, issue.Suppl, pp.1161364-1372, 2009.
DOI : 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2009.02239.x
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/inserm-00462793

B. Coulm, L. Ray, C. Lelong, N. Drewniak, N. Zeitlin et al., Obstetric Interventions for Low-Risk Pregnant Women in France: Do Maternity Unit Characteristics Make a Difference?, Birth, vol.39, issue.2, pp.183-191
DOI : 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2012.00547.x

C. Roberts, C. Algert, J. Ford, A. Todd, and J. Morris, Pathways to a rising caesarean section rate: a population-based cohort study, BMJ Open, vol.2, issue.5, pp.1725-1735
DOI : 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001725

B. Reime, M. Klein, A. Kelly, N. Duxbury, L. Saxell et al., Do maternity care provider groups have different attitudes towards birth? BJOG, pp.1111388-1393, 2004.

Z. Alfirevic, S. Milan, and S. Livio, Caesarean section versus vaginal delivery for preterm birth in singletons, Cochrane Database Syst Rev, vol.6, p.78, 2012.

R. Salim and E. Shalev, Health implications resulting from the timing of elective cesarean delivery, Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology, vol.8, issue.1, p.68, 2010.
DOI : 10.1186/1477-7827-8-68

U. Hogberg and P. Holmgren, Infant mortality of very preterm infants by mode of delivery, institutional policies and maternal diagnosis, Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, vol.86, issue.6
DOI : 10.1080/00016340701371306

F. Chervenak and L. Mccullough, The professional responsibility model of obstetric ethics and caesarean delivery, Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology, vol.27, issue.2, pp.153-164
DOI : 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2012.09.001

D. Leeuw, R. Cuttini, M. Nadai, M. Berbik, I. Hansen et al., Treatment choices for extremely preterm infants: An international perspective, The Journal of Pediatrics, vol.137, issue.5, pp.608-616, 2000.
DOI : 10.1067/mpd.2000.109144

K. Hogle, E. Hutton, K. Mcbrien, J. Barrett, and M. Hannah, Cesarean delivery for twins: A systematic review and meta-analysis, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol.188, issue.1, pp.220-227, 2003.
DOI : 10.1067/mob.2003.64

J. Barrett, M. Hannah, E. Hutton, A. Willan, A. Allen et al., A randomized trial of planned cesarean or vaginal delivery for twin pregnancy, N Engl J Med, vol.2013, issue.14, pp.3691295-1305