O. Gynecological and . Department, 11 Public health laboratory

D. Osoba, Health-related quality of life and cancer clinical trials, Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology, vol.24, issue.5, pp.57-71, 2011.
DOI : 10.1056/NEJMoa1000678

A. Montazeri, Health-related quality of life in breast cancer patients: A bibliographic review of the literature from 1974 to 2007, Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research, vol.27, issue.1, p.32, 2008.
DOI : 10.1186/1756-9966-27-32

P. Ubel, Y. Peeters, and D. Smith, Abandoning the language of ???response shift???: a plea for conceptual clarity in distinguishing scale recalibration from true changes in quality of life, Quality of Life Research, vol.15, issue.5, pp.465-471, 2010.
DOI : 10.1007/s11136-010-9592-x

I. Wiklund, Assessment of patient-reported outcomes in clinical trials: the example of health-related quality of life, Fundamental and Clinical Pharmacology, vol.25, issue.2, pp.351-363, 2004.
DOI : 10.1016/S1386-5056(00)00130-1

M. Bullinger, Assessing health related quality of life in medicine. An overview over concepts, methods and applications in international research, Restor Neurol Neurosci, vol.20, pp.93-101, 2002.

F. Gibbons, Social comparison as a mediator of response shift, Social Science & Medicine, vol.48, issue.11, pp.1517-1530, 1999.
DOI : 10.1016/S0277-9536(99)00046-5

G. Howard, P. Dailey, and N. Gulianick, The Feasibility of Informed Pretests in Attenuating Response-Shift Bias, Applied Psychological Measurement, vol.3, issue.4, pp.481-494, 1979.
DOI : 10.1177/014662167900300406

G. Howard, K. Ralph, N. Gulianick, S. Maxwell, S. Nance et al., Internal Invalidity in Pretest-Posttest Self-Report Evaluations and a Re-evaluation of Retrospective Pretests, Applied Psychological Measurement, vol.3, issue.1, pp.1-23, 1979.
DOI : 10.1177/014662167900300101

M. Sprangers and C. Schwartz, Integrating response shift into health-related quality of life research: a theoretical model, Social Science & Medicine, vol.48, issue.11, pp.1507-1515, 1999.
DOI : 10.1016/S0277-9536(99)00045-3

I. Korfage, H. De-koning, and M. Essink-bot, Response shift due to diagnosis and primary treatment of localized prostate cancer: a then-test and a vignette study, Quality of Life Research, vol.63, issue.4, pp.1627-1634, 2007.
DOI : 10.1007/s11136-007-9265-6

F. Oort, M. Visser, and M. Sprangers, An application of structural equation modeling to detect response shifts and true change in quality of life data from cancer patients undergoing invasive surgery, Quality of Life Research, vol.14, issue.3, pp.599-609, 2005.
DOI : 10.1007/s11136-004-0831-x

C. Schwartz and M. Sprangers, Methodological approaches for assessing response shift in longitudinal health-related quality-of-life research, Social Science & Medicine, vol.48, issue.11, pp.1531-1548, 1999.
DOI : 10.1016/S0277-9536(99)00047-7

M. Sprangers, V. Dam, F. Broersen, J. Lodder, L. Wever et al., Revealing response shift in longitudinal research on fatigue?the use of the thentest approach, Acta Oncol, vol.38, pp.709-718, 1999.

N. Schmitt, The Use Of Analysis Of Covariance Structures To Assess Beta And Gamma Change, Multivariate Behavioral Research, vol.17, issue.3, pp.343-358, 1982.
DOI : 10.1207/s15327906mbr1703_3

S. Ahmed, N. Mayo, M. Corbiere, S. Wood-dauphinee, J. Hanley et al., Change in quality of life of people with stroke over time: true change or response shift? Qual Life Res, pp.611-627, 2005.

F. Oort, Using structural equation modeling to detect response shifts and true change, Quality of Life Research, vol.2, issue.3, pp.587-598, 2005.
DOI : 10.1007/s11136-004-0830-y

B. King-kallimanis, F. Oort, S. Nolte, C. Schwartz, and M. Sprangers, Using structural equation modeling to detect response shift in performance and health-related quality of life scores of multiple sclerosis patients, Quality of Life Research, vol.54, issue.10, pp.1527-1540, 2011.
DOI : 10.1007/s11136-010-9844-9

S. Craig, Measuring Change Retrospectively: An Examination Based on Item Response Theory.I n " Measuring Behavioral Change: Methodological Considerations, Symposium Presented at the Annual Conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 2000.

A. Meade, J. Ellington, and S. Craig, Exploratory Measurement Invariance: A New Method Based on Item Response Theory, Symposium Presented at the 19th Annual Conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 2004.

T. Dabakuyo, F. Guillemin, T. Conroy, M. Velten, D. Jolly et al., Response shift effects on measuring post-operative quality of life among breast cancer patients: a multicenter cohort study, Quality of Life Research, vol.88, issue.12, pp.1-11, 2013.
DOI : 10.1007/s11136-012-0135-5

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00687542

N. Aaronson, S. Ahmedzai, B. Bergman, M. Bullinger, A. Cull et al., The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: A Quality-of-Life Instrument for Use in International Clinical Trials in Oncology, JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, vol.85, issue.5, pp.365-376, 1993.
DOI : 10.1093/jnci/85.5.365

M. Sprangers, M. Groenvold, J. Arraras, J. Franklin, A. Te-velde et al., The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer breast cancer-specific quality-of-life questionnaire module: first results from a three-country field study., Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol.14, issue.10, pp.2756-2768, 1996.
DOI : 10.1200/JCO.1996.14.10.2756

D. Osoba, G. Rodrigues, J. Myles, B. Zee, and J. Pater, Interpreting the significance of changes in health-related quality-of-life scores., Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol.16, issue.1, pp.139-144, 1998.
DOI : 10.1200/JCO.1998.16.1.139

D. Hoffman, D. Leeuw, and J. , Interpreting multiple correspondence analysis as a multidimensional scaling method, Marketing Letters, vol.25, issue.3, pp.259-272, 1992.
DOI : 10.1007/BF00994134

M. Greenacre, Interpreting multiple correspondence analysis Appl Stochastic Model Data Anal, pp.195-210, 2006.

G. Fischer, Some Probabilistic Models for Measuring Change.InAdvances in Psychological and Educational Measurement, 1976.

G. Fischer, Some Latent Trait Models for Measuring Change in Qualitative ObservationsInNew Horizons in Testing. Latent Trait Theory and Computerized Adaptive Testing, 1983.

G. Fischer and I. Ponocny, An extension of the partial credit model with an application to the measurement of change, Psychometrika, vol.47, issue.2, pp.177-192, 1994.
DOI : 10.1007/BF02295182

G. Fischer and P. Parzer, An extension of the rating scale model with an application to the measurement of change, Psychometrika, vol.1, issue.4, pp.637-651, 1991.
DOI : 10.1007/BF02294496

G. Rasch, Probabilistic Models for Some Intelligence and Attainment Tests. The Danish Institute of, Educational Research, 1960.

G. Fischer, Linear Logistic Models for Change. Rasch Models. Foundations, Recent Developments and Applications, 1995.

W. Van-der-linden and R. Hambleton, Handbook of Modern Item Response Theory, 1997.
DOI : 10.1007/978-1-4757-2691-6

P. Mair and R. Hatzinger, CML based estimation of extended Rasch models with the eRm package in R, Psychol Sci Q, vol.49, pp.26-43, 2007.

P. Mair and R. Hatzinger, Extended rasch modeling: the eRm package for the application of IRT models in R, J Stat Softw, vol.20, pp.1-20, 2007.

R. Barclay-goddard, J. Epstein, and N. Mayo, Response shift: a brief overview and proposed research priorities, Quality of Life Research, vol.15, issue.3, pp.335-346, 2009.
DOI : 10.1007/s11136-009-9450-x

A. Costello and J. Osborne, Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis, Pract Asses Res Eval, vol.10, pp.173-178, 2005.

R. Development-core-team, R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing

S. Lê, J. Josse, and F. Husson, FactoMineR: an R package for multivariate analysis, J Stat Softw, vol.25, pp.1-18, 2008.

R. Hatzinger and T. Rusch, IRT models with relaxed assumptions in eRm: a manual-like instruction, Psychol Sci Q, vol.51, pp.87-120, 2009.

C. Schwartz and M. Sprangers, Guidelines for improving the stringency of response shift research using the thentest, Quality of Life Research, vol.17, issue.2, pp.455-464, 2010.
DOI : 10.1007/s11136-010-9585-9

C. Schwartz and B. Rapkin, Understanding appraisal processes underlying the thentest: a mixed methods investigation, Quality of Life Research, vol.48, issue.5, pp.381-388, 2012.
DOI : 10.1007/s11136-011-0023-4

M. Visser, F. Oort, and M. Sprangers, Methods to detect response shift in quality of life data: A convergent validity study, Quality of Life Research, vol.19, issue.3, pp.629-639, 2005.
DOI : 10.1007/s11136-004-2577-x

S. Nolte, G. Elsworth, A. Sinclair, and R. Osborne, Tests of measurement invariance failed to support the application of the ???then-test???, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, vol.62, issue.11, pp.1173-1180, 2009.
DOI : 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.01.021

S. Ahmed, J. Bourbeau, F. Maltais, and A. Mansour, The Oort structural equation modeling approach detected a response shift after a COPD self-management program not detected by the Schmitt technique, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, vol.62, issue.11, pp.1165-1172, 2009.
DOI : 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.03.015

P. Gandhi, L. Ried, I. Huang, C. Kimberlin, and T. Kauf, Assessment of response shift using two structural equation modeling techniques, Quality of Life Research, vol.17, issue.6, pp.461-471, 2013.
DOI : 10.1007/s11136-012-0171-1

G. Donaldson, Structural Equation Models for Quality of Life Response Shifts: Promises and Pitfalls, Quality of Life Research, vol.12, issue.Part 2, pp.2345-2351, 2005.
DOI : 10.1007/s11136-005-3977-2

B. King-kallimanis, F. Oort, M. Visser, and M. Sprangers, Structural equation modeling of health-related quality-of-life data illustrates the measurement and conceptual perspectives on response shift, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, vol.62, issue.11, pp.1157-1164, 2009.
DOI : 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.04.004

M. Edelen and B. Reeve, Applying item response theory (IRT) modeling to questionnaire development, evaluation, and refinement, Quality of Life Research, vol.21, issue.1, pp.5-18, 2007.
DOI : 10.1007/s11136-007-9198-0

F. Floyd and K. Widaman, Factor analysis in the development and refinement of clinical assessment instruments., Psychological Assessment, vol.7, issue.3, pp.286-299, 1995.
DOI : 10.1037/1040-3590.7.3.286

R. Hambleton, Emergence of item response modeling in instrument development and data analysis, Med Care, vol.38, pp.60-65, 2000.

J. Lai, P. Crane, and D. Cella, Factor analysis techniques for assessing sufficient unidimensionality of cancer related fatigue, Quality of Life Research, vol.25, issue.7, pp.1179-1190, 2006.
DOI : 10.1007/s11136-006-0060-6

S. Mclachlan, G. Devins, and P. Goodwin, Factor analysis of the psychosocial items of the EORTC QLQ-C30 in metastatic breast cancer patients participating in a psychosocial intervention study, Quality of Life Research, vol.8, issue.4, pp.311-317, 1999.
DOI : 10.1023/A:1008939818096

S. Reise, K. Widaman, and R. Pugh, Confirmatory factor analysis and item response theory: Two approaches for exploring measurement invariance., Psychological Bulletin, vol.114, issue.3, pp.552-566, 1993.
DOI : 10.1037/0033-2909.114.3.552

A. Smith, P. Wright, P. Selby, and G. Velikova, A Rasch and factor analysis of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G), Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, vol.5, issue.1, p.19, 2007.
DOI : 10.1186/1477-7525-5-19

L. Liu, D. Hedeker, and R. Mermelstein, Modeling Nicotine Dependence: An Application of a Longitudinal IRT Model for the Analysis of Adolescent Nicotine Dependence Syndrome Scale, Nicotine & Tobacco Research, vol.15, issue.2, pp.326-333, 2013.
DOI : 10.1093/ntr/nts125

M. Blanchin, J. Hardouin, L. Neel, T. Kubis, G. Blanchard et al., Comparaison of CTT and rasch-based approaches for the analysis of longitudinal patient reported outcomes, pp.825-838, 2011.

R. Swartz, C. Schwartz, E. Basch, L. Cai, D. Fairclough et al., The king???s foot of patient-reported outcomes: current practices and new developments for the measurement of change, Quality of Life Research, vol.8, issue.2, pp.1159-1167, 2011.
DOI : 10.1007/s11136-011-9863-1

R. Van-nispen, D. Knol, H. Neve, and G. Van-rens, A multilevel item response theory model was investigated for longitudinal vision-related quality-of-life data, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, vol.63, issue.3, pp.321-330, 2010.
DOI : 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.06.012

J. Douglas, Item response models for longitudinal quality of life data in clinical trials, Statistics in Medicine, vol.41, issue.21, pp.2917-2931, 1999.
DOI : 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19991115)18:21<2917::AID-SIM204>3.0.CO;2-N

C. Glas, H. Geerlings, M. Van-de-laar, and E. Taal, Analysis of longitudinal randomized clinical trials using item response models, Contemporary Clinical Trials, vol.30, issue.2, pp.158-170, 2009.
DOI : 10.1016/j.cct.2008.12.003

S. Craig, Implicit theories and beta change in longitudinal evaluations of training effectiveness: an investigation using item response theory Dissertation submitted to the Faculty of the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, 2002.

C. Schwartz, M. J. Swaim, B. Bode, R. Kim, and D. , Detecting response shift in using rasch analysis of then test data, Qual Life Res, p.15, 2007.

F. Bonnetain, L. Dahan, E. Maillard, M. Ychou, E. Mitry et al., Time until definitive quality of life score deterioration as a means of longitudinal analysis for treatment trials in patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma, European Journal of Cancer, vol.46, issue.15, pp.2753-2762, 2010.
DOI : 10.1016/j.ejca.2010.07.023

Z. Hamidou, T. Dabakuyo, M. Mercier, J. Fraisse, S. Causeret et al., Time to Deterioration in Quality of Life Score as a Modality of Longitudinal Analysis in Patients with Breast Cancer, The Oncologist, vol.16, issue.10, pp.1458-1468, 2011.
DOI : 10.1634/theoncologist.2011-0085

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00687536

. Anota, Item response theory and factor analysis as a mean to characterize occurrence of response shift in a longitudinal quality of life study in breast cancer patients, Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, vol.12, issue.1, p.32, 2014.
DOI : 10.1634/theoncologist.2011-0085

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/inserm-00997569