H. Bastian, P. Glasziou, and I. Chalmers, Seventy-Five Trials and Eleven Systematic Reviews a Day: How Will We Ever Keep Up?, PLoS Medicine, vol.5, issue.9, p.1000326, 2010.
DOI : 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000326.s001

A. Liberati, D. Altman, J. Tetzlaff, C. Mulrow, P. Gotzsche et al., The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, vol.62, issue.10, pp.1-34, 2009.
DOI : 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.06.006

L. Hedges, Commentary, Statistics in Medicine, vol.2, issue.3, pp.381-385, 1987.
DOI : 10.1002/sim.4780060333

I. Chalmers, L. Hedges, and H. Cooper, A Brief History of Research Synthesis, Evaluation & the Health Professions, vol.6, issue.3, pp.12-37, 2002.
DOI : 10.1177/0163278702025001003

A. Hill, Memories of the British streptomycin trial in tuberculosis, Controlled Clinical Trials, vol.11, issue.2, pp.77-79, 1990.
DOI : 10.1016/0197-2456(90)90001-I

T. Sterling, Publication decisions and their possible effects on inferences drawn from tests of significance -or vice versa, J Am Stat Assoc, vol.54, pp.30-34, 1959.

R. Rosenthal, The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results., Psychological Bulletin, vol.86, issue.3, pp.638-641, 1979.
DOI : 10.1037/0033-2909.86.3.638

K. Dickersin, S. Chan, T. Chalmers, H. Sacks, H. Smith et al., Publication bias and clinical trials, Controlled Clinical Trials, vol.8, issue.4, pp.343-353, 1987.
DOI : 10.1016/0197-2456(87)90155-3

P. Easterbrook, J. Berlin, R. Gopalan, and D. Matthews, Publication bias in clinical research, The Lancet, vol.337, issue.8746, pp.867-872, 1991.
DOI : 10.1016/0140-6736(91)90201-Y

K. Dickersin, Y. Min, and C. Meinert, Factors influencing publication of research results. Follow-up of applications submitted to two institutional review boards, JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association, vol.267, issue.3, pp.374-378, 1992.
DOI : 10.1001/jama.267.3.374

K. Light, Analyzing nonlinear scatchard plots, Science, vol.223, issue.4631, pp.76-78, 1984.
DOI : 10.1126/science.6546323

C. Begg and J. Berlin, Publication Bias: A Problem in Interpreting Medical Data, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (Statistics in Society), vol.151, issue.3, pp.419-463, 1988.
DOI : 10.2307/2982993

K. Dear and C. Begg, An Approach for Assessing Publication Bias Prior to Performing a Meta-Analysis, Statistical Science, vol.7, issue.2, pp.237-245, 1992.
DOI : 10.1214/ss/1177011363

L. Hedges, Modeling Publication Selection Effects in Meta-Analysis, Statistical Science, vol.7, issue.2, pp.246-255, 1992.
DOI : 10.1214/ss/1177011364

S. Pocock, M. Hughes, and R. Lee, Statistical Problems in the Reporting of Clinical Trials, New England Journal of Medicine, vol.317, issue.7, pp.426-432, 1987.
DOI : 10.1056/NEJM198708133170706

E. Hemminki, Study of information submitted by drug companies to licensing authorities., BMJ, vol.280, issue.6217, pp.833-836, 1980.
DOI : 10.1136/bmj.280.6217.833

P. Gotzsche, Multiple publication of reports of drug trials, European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, vol.305, issue.5, pp.429-432, 1989.
DOI : 10.1007/BF00558064

M. Kramer and S. Shapiro, Scientific Challenges in the Application of Randomized Trials, JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association, vol.252, issue.19, pp.2739-2745, 1984.
DOI : 10.1001/jama.1984.03350190041017

T. Chalmers, H. Smith, . Jr, B. Blackburn, B. Silverman et al., A method for assessing the quality of a randomized control trial, Controlled Clinical Trials, vol.2, issue.1, pp.31-49, 1981.
DOI : 10.1016/0197-2456(81)90056-8

J. Emerson, E. Burdick, D. Hoaglin, F. Mosteller, and T. Chalmers, An empirical study of the possible relation of treatment differences to quality scores in controlled randomized clinical trials, Controlled Clinical Trials, vol.11, issue.5, pp.339-352, 1990.
DOI : 10.1016/0197-2456(90)90175-2

P. Juni, A. Witschi, R. Bloch, and M. Egger, The Hazards of Scoring the Quality of Clinical Trials for Meta-analysis, JAMA, vol.282, issue.11, pp.1054-1060, 1999.
DOI : 10.1001/jama.282.11.1054

D. Moher, A. Jadad, and P. Tugwell, Abstract, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, vol.170, issue.02, pp.195-208, 1996.
DOI : 10.1001/jama.263.10.1401

K. Schulz, Subverting Randomization in Controlled Trials, JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association, vol.274, issue.18, pp.1456-1458, 1995.
DOI : 10.1001/jama.1995.03530180050029

K. Schulz, I. Chalmers, R. Hayes, and D. Altman, Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials, JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association, vol.273, issue.5, pp.408-412, 1995.
DOI : 10.1001/jama.273.5.408

C. Naylor, Meta-analysis and the meta-epidemiology of clinical research, BMJ, vol.315, issue.7109, pp.617-619, 1997.
DOI : 10.1136/bmj.315.7109.617

J. Sterne, P. Juni, K. Schulz, D. Altman, C. Bartlett et al., Statistical methods for assessing the influence of study characteristics on treatment effects in ???meta-epidemiological??? research, Statistics in Medicine, vol.317, issue.11, pp.1513-1524, 2002.
DOI : 10.1002/sim.1184

J. Higgins, D. Altman, P. Gotzsche, P. Juni, D. Moher et al., The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials, BMJ, vol.343, issue.oct18 2, p.5928, 2011.
DOI : 10.1136/bmj.d5928

G. Guyatt, A. Oxman, G. Vist, R. Kunz, Y. Falck-ytter et al., GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations, BMJ, vol.336, issue.7650, pp.924-926, 2008.
DOI : 10.1136/bmj.39489.470347.AD

S. Green, J. Higgins, and . Glossary, Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions 4.2, 2005.

P. Juni, D. Altman, and M. Egger, Systematic reviews in health care: Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials, BMJ, vol.323, issue.7303, pp.42-46, 2001.
DOI : 10.1136/bmj.323.7303.42

C. Begg, M. Cho, S. Eastwood, R. Horton, D. Moher et al., Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials, JAMA, vol.276, issue.8, pp.637-639, 1996.
DOI : 10.1001/jama.1996.03540080059030

A. Cochrane, Effectiveness and efficiency: random reflections on health services, 1973.

D. Moher, K. Schulz, and D. Altman, The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials, The Lancet, vol.357, issue.9263, pp.1191-1194, 2001.
DOI : 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)04337-3

K. Schulz, D. Altman, and D. Moher, CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials, BMJ, vol.340, issue.mar23 1, p.332, 2010.
DOI : 10.1136/bmj.c332

K. Schulz, I. Chalmers, D. Altman, D. Grimes, and C. Dore, The methodologic quality of randomization as assessed from reports of trials in specialist and general medical journals, Online J Curr Clin Trials, vol.197, p.81, 1995.

M. Egger, S. Davey, M. Schneider, and C. Minder, Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test, BMJ, vol.315, issue.7109, pp.629-634, 1997.
DOI : 10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629

A. Chan, A. Hrobjartsson, M. Haahr, P. Gotzsche, and D. Altman, Empirical Evidence for Selective Reporting of Outcomes in Randomized Trials, JAMA, vol.291, issue.20, pp.2457-2465, 2004.
DOI : 10.1001/jama.291.20.2457

A. De, J. Drazen, F. Frizelle, C. Haug, J. Hoey et al., Clinical trial registration: a statement from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors, N Engl J Med, vol.351, pp.1250-1251, 2004.

K. Dwan, D. Altman, J. Arnaiz, J. Bloom, A. Chan et al., Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias, PLoS ONE, vol.8, issue.8, p.3081, 2008.
DOI : 10.1371/journal.pone.0003081.s002

L. Wood, M. Egger, L. Gluud, K. Schulz, P. Juni et al., Empirical evidence of bias in treatment effect estimates in controlled trials with different interventions and outcomes: meta-epidemiological study, BMJ, vol.336, issue.7644, pp.601-605, 2008.
DOI : 10.1136/bmj.39465.451748.AD

J. Sterne, A. Sutton, J. Ioannidis, N. Terrin, D. Jones et al., Recommendations for examining and interpreting funnel plot asymmetry in meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials, BMJ, vol.343, issue.jul22 1, p.4002, 2011.
DOI : 10.1136/bmj.d4002

J. Savovic, H. Jones, D. Altman, R. Harris, P. Juni et al., Influence of Reported Study Design Characteristics on Intervention Effect Estimates From Randomized, Controlled Trials, Annals of Internal Medicine, vol.157, issue.6, pp.429-438, 2012.
DOI : 10.7326/0003-4819-157-6-201209180-00537

J. Kirkham, K. Dwan, D. Altman, C. Gamble, S. Dodd et al., The impact of outcome reporting bias in randomised controlled trials on a cohort of systematic reviews, BMJ, vol.340, issue.feb15 1, p.365, 2010.
DOI : 10.1136/bmj.c365

J. Pildal, A. Hrobjartsson, K. Jorgensen, J. Hilden, D. Altman et al., Impact of allocation concealment on conclusions drawn from meta-analyses of randomized trials, International Journal of Epidemiology, vol.36, issue.4, pp.847-857, 2007.
DOI : 10.1093/ije/dym087

H. Beecher, THE POWERFUL PLACEBO, Journal of the American Medical Association, vol.159, issue.17, pp.1602-1606, 1955.
DOI : 10.1001/jama.1955.02960340022006

T. Chalmers, P. Celano, H. Sacks, H. Smith, and . Jr, Bias in Treatment Assignment in Controlled Clinical Trials, New England Journal of Medicine, vol.309, issue.22, pp.1358-1361, 1983.
DOI : 10.1056/NEJM198312013092204

A. Hróbjartsson and P. Gøtzsche, Placebo interventions for all clinical conditions, Cochrane Database Syst Rev, vol.1, 2010.

A. Hrobjartsson, A. Thomsen, F. Emanuelsson, B. Tendal, J. Hilden et al., Observer bias in randomised clinical trials with binary outcomes: systematic review of trials with both blinded and non-blinded outcome assessors, BMJ, vol.344, issue.feb27 2, p.1119
DOI : 10.1136/bmj.e1119

P. Gotzsche, Blinding during data analysis and writing of manuscripts, Controlled Clinical Trials, vol.17, issue.4, pp.285-290, 1996.
DOI : 10.1016/0197-2456(95)00263-4

M. Haahr and A. Hrobjartsson, Who is blinded in randomized clinical trials? A study of 200 trials and a survey of authors, Clinical Trials, vol.365, issue.4, pp.360-365, 2006.
DOI : 10.1177/1740774506069153

K. Schulz, I. Chalmers, and D. Altman, The Landscape and Lexicon of Blinding in Randomized Trials, Annals of Internal Medicine, vol.136, issue.3, pp.254-259, 2002.
DOI : 10.7326/0003-4819-136-3-200202050-00022

P. Devereaux, B. Manns, W. Ghali, H. Quan, C. Lacchetti et al., Physician Interpretations and Textbook Definitions of Blinding Terminology in Randomized Controlled Trials, JAMA, vol.285, issue.15, pp.2000-2003, 2001.
DOI : 10.1001/jama.285.15.2000

I. Boutron, C. Estellat, and P. Ravaud, A review of blinding in randomized controlled trials found results inconsistent and questionable, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, vol.58, issue.12, pp.1220-1226, 2005.
DOI : 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.04.006

V. Montori, M. Bhandari, P. Devereaux, B. Manns, W. Ghali et al., In the dark The reporting of blinding status in randomized controlled trials, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, vol.55, issue.8, pp.787-790, 2002.
DOI : 10.1016/S0895-4356(02)00446-8

A. Hróbjartsson, A. Thomsen, F. Emanuelsson, B. Tendal, J. Hilden et al., Observer bias in randomized clinical trials with measurement scale outcomes: a systematic review of trials with both blinded and nonblinded assessors, Canadian Medical Association Journal, vol.185, issue.4, pp.201-211, 2013.
DOI : 10.1503/cmaj.120744

I. Boutron, C. Estellat, L. Guittet, A. Dechartres, D. Sackett et al., Methods of Blinding in Reports of Randomized Controlled Trials Assessing Pharmacologic Treatments: A Systematic Review, PLoS Medicine, vol.330, issue.10, p.425, 2006.
DOI : 10.1371/journal.pmed.0030425.sd001
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/inserm-00128342

S. Goodman and K. Dickersin, Metabias: A Challenge for Comparative Effectiveness Research, Annals of Internal Medicine, vol.155, issue.1, pp.61-62, 2011.
DOI : 10.7326/0003-4819-155-1-201107050-00010

T. Sterling, W. Rosenbaum, and J. Weinkam, Publication decisions revisited: the effect of the outcome of statistical tests on the decision to publish and vice versa, Am Stat, vol.49, pp.108-112, 1995.

R. Moscati, D. Jehle, D. Ellis, A. Fiorello, and M. Landi, Positive-outcome Bias: Comparison of Emergency Medicine and General Medicine Literatures, Academic Emergency Medicine, vol.15, issue.3
DOI : 10.1111/j.1553-2712.1994.tb02443.x

D. Liebeskind, C. Kidwell, J. Sayre, and J. Saver, Evidence of publication bias in reporting acute stroke clinical trials, Neurology, vol.67, issue.6, pp.973-979, 2006.
DOI : 10.1212/01.wnl.0000237331.16541.ac

A. Carter, G. Griffin, and T. Carter, A survey identified publication bias in the secondary literature, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, vol.59, issue.3, pp.241-245, 2006.
DOI : 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.08.011

E. Weber, M. Callaham, R. Wears, C. Barton, and G. Young, Unpublished Research From a Medical Specialty Meeting, JAMA, vol.280, issue.3, pp.257-259, 1998.
DOI : 10.1001/jama.280.3.257

K. Dickersin and Y. Min, NIH clinical trials and publication bias, Online J Curr Clin Trials, vol.50, p.4967, 1993.

K. Dickersin, How important is publication bias? A synthesis of available data, AIDS Educ Prev, vol.9, pp.15-21, 1997.

J. Vevea and L. Hedges, A general linear model for estimating effect size in the presence of publication bias, Psychometrika, vol.31, issue.3, pp.419-435, 1995.
DOI : 10.1007/BF02294384

S. Taylor and R. Tweedie, Practical estimates of the effect of publication bias in meta-analysis, Aust Epidemiol, vol.5, pp.14-17, 1998.

G. Givens, D. Smith, and R. Tweedie, Publication bias in meta-analysis: a Bayesian data-augmentation approach to account for issues exemplified in the passive smoking debate, Stat Sci, pp.221-240, 1997.

S. Duval and R. Tweedie, Trim and Fill: A Simple Funnel-Plot-Based Method of Testing and Adjusting for Publication Bias in Meta-Analysis, Biometrics, vol.338, issue.2, pp.455-463, 2000.
DOI : 10.1111/j.0006-341X.2000.00455.x

J. Sterne and M. Egger, Funnel plots for detecting bias in meta-analysis, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, vol.54, issue.10, pp.1046-1055, 2001.
DOI : 10.1016/S0895-4356(01)00377-8

N. Terrin, C. Schmid, J. Lau, and I. Olkin, Adjusting for publication bias in the presence of heterogeneity, Statistics in Medicine, vol.64, issue.13, pp.2113-2126, 2003.
DOI : 10.1002/sim.1461

G. Schwarzer, G. Antes, and M. Schumacher, A test for publication bias in meta-analysis with sparse binary data, Statistics in Medicine, vol.64, issue.4, pp.721-733, 2007.
DOI : 10.1002/sim.2588

J. Peters, A. Sutton, D. Jones, K. Abrams, and L. Rushton, Contour-enhanced meta-analysis funnel plots help distinguish publication bias from other causes of asymmetry, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, vol.61, issue.10, pp.991-996, 2008.
DOI : 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.11.010

S. Moreno, A. Sutton, A. Ades, T. Stanley, K. Abrams et al., Assessment of regression-based methods to adjust for publication bias through a comprehensive simulation study, BMC Medical Research Methodology, vol.151, issue.3, 2009.
DOI : 10.2307/2982993

S. Moreno, A. Sutton, E. Turner, K. Abrams, N. Cooper et al., Novel methods to deal with publication biases: secondary analysis of antidepressant trials in the FDA trial registry database and related journal publications, BMJ, vol.339, issue.aug07 1, p.2981, 2009.
DOI : 10.1136/bmj.b2981

N. Terrin, C. Schmid, and J. Lau, In an empirical evaluation of the funnel plot, researchers could not visually identify publication bias, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, vol.58, issue.9, pp.894-901, 2005.
DOI : 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.01.006

J. Peters, A. Sutton, D. Jones, K. Abrams, and L. Rushton, Comparison of Two Methods to Detect Publication Bias in Meta-analysis, JAMA, vol.295, issue.6, pp.676-680, 2006.
DOI : 10.1001/jama.295.6.676

J. Peters, A. Sutton, D. Jones, K. Abrams, and L. Rushton, Performance of the trim and fill method in the presence of publication bias and between-study heterogeneity, Statistics in Medicine, vol.327, issue.25, pp.4544-4562, 2007.
DOI : 10.1002/sim.2889

J. Ioannidis and T. Trikalinos, The appropriateness of asymmetry tests for publication bias in meta-analyses: a large survey, Canadian Medical Association Journal, vol.176, issue.8, pp.1091-1096, 2007.
DOI : 10.1503/cmaj.060410

J. Sterne, M. Egger, and D. Moher, Chapter 10: addressing reporting biasesInCochrane handbook for systematic reviews of intervention, 2011.

J. Hutton and P. Williamson, Bias in meta-analysis due to outcome variable selection within studies, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series C (Applied Statistics), vol.49, issue.3, pp.359-370, 2002.
DOI : 10.1111/1467-9876.00197

S. Hahn, P. Williamson, and J. Hutton, Investigation of within-study selective reporting in clinical research: follow-up of applications submitted to a local research ethics committee, Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, vol.88, issue.3, pp.353-359, 2002.
DOI : 10.1111/1467-9876.00197

A. Chan, K. Krleza-jeric, I. Schmid, and D. Altman, Outcome reporting bias in randomized trials funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Canadian Medical Association Journal, vol.171, issue.7, pp.735-740, 2004.
DOI : 10.1503/cmaj.1041086

E. Von-elm, A. Rollin, A. Blumle, C. Senessie, N. Low et al., Selective reporting of outcomes of drug trials. Comparison of study protocols and published articles, 2006.

T. Furukawa, N. Watanabe, I. Omori, V. Montori, and G. Guyatt, Association Between Unreported Outcomes and Effect Size Estimates in Cochrane Meta-analyses, JAMA, vol.297, issue.5, pp.468-470, 2007.
DOI : 10.1001/jama.297.5.468-b

M. Page, J. Mckenzie, and A. Forbes, Many scenarios exist for selective inclusion and reporting of results in randomized trials and systematic reviews, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, vol.66, issue.5, 2013.
DOI : 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2012.10.010

A. Chan and D. Altman, Identifying outcome reporting bias in randomised trials on PubMed: review of publications and survey of authors, BMJ, vol.330, issue.7494, p.753, 2005.
DOI : 10.1136/bmj.38356.424606.8F

R. Smyth, J. Kirkham, A. Jacoby, D. Altman, C. Gamble et al., Frequency and reasons for outcome reporting bias in clinical trials: interviews with trialists, BMJ, vol.342, issue.jan06 1, p.7153, 2011.
DOI : 10.1136/bmj.c7153

K. Dwan, C. Gamble, P. Williamson, and J. Kirkham, Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias ??? An Updated Review, PLoS ONE, vol.31, issue.7, p.66844, 2013.
DOI : 10.1371/journal.pone.0066844.s003

P. Williamson, C. Gamble, D. Altman, and J. Hutton, Outcome selection bias in meta-analysis, Statistical Methods in Medical Research, vol.14, issue.5, pp.515-524, 2005.
DOI : 10.1191/0962280205sm415oa

P. Williamson, D. Altman, J. Blazeby, M. Clarke, and E. Gargon, Driving up the quality and relevance of research through the use of agreed core outcomes, Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, vol.17, issue.1, pp.1-2, 2012.
DOI : 10.1258/jhsrp.2011.011131

S. Greenland, O. Rourke, and K. , On the bias produced by quality scores in meta-analysis, and a hierarchical view of proposed solutions, Biostatistics, vol.2, issue.4, pp.463-471, 2001.
DOI : 10.1093/biostatistics/2.4.463

J. Berlin, Does blinding of readers affect the results of meta-analyses?, The Lancet, vol.350, issue.9072, pp.185-186, 1997.
DOI : 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)62352-5

K. Morissette, A. Tricco, T. Horsley, M. Chen, and D. Moher, Blinded versus unblinded assessments of risk of bias in studies included in a systematic review, Cochrane Database Syst Rev, vol.61, issue.8, p.25, 2011.
DOI : 10.1002/14651858.MR000025.pub2

D. Moher, B. Pham, A. Jones, D. Cook, A. Jadad et al., Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses? Lancet, pp.609-613, 1998.

S. Gabriel and N. Sl, Getting the Methods Right ??? The Foundation of Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, New England Journal of Medicine, vol.367, issue.9, pp.787-790, 2012.
DOI : 10.1056/NEJMp1207437

I. Simera, D. Moher, J. Hoey, K. Schulz, and D. Altman, A catalogue of reporting guidelines for health research, European Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol.5, issue.1, pp.35-53, 2010.
DOI : 10.1111/j.1365-2362.2009.02234.x

S. Hopewell, S. Dutton, L. Yu, A. Chan, and D. Altman, The quality of reports of randomised trials in 2000 and 2006: comparative study of articles indexed in PubMed, BMJ, vol.340, issue.mar23 1, p.723, 2010.
DOI : 10.1136/bmj.c723

L. Turner, L. Shamseer, D. Altman, L. Weeks, J. Peters et al., Consolidated standards of reporting trials (CONSORT) and the completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) published in medical journals, Cochrane Database Syst Rev, vol.152, issue.2, p.30, 2012.
DOI : 10.1002/14651858.MR000030.pub2

R. Simes, Publication bias: the case for an international registry of clinical trials., Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol.4, issue.10, pp.1529-1541, 1986.
DOI : 10.1200/JCO.1986.4.10.1529

D. Moher, Clinical-trial registration: a call for its implementation in Canada, CMAJ, vol.149, pp.1657-1658, 1993.

R. Horton and R. Smith, Time to register randomised trials, BMJ, vol.319, issue.7214, pp.865-866, 1999.
DOI : 10.1136/bmj.319.7214.865

K. Abbasi, Compulsory registration of clinical trials, BMJ, vol.329, issue.7467, pp.637-638, 2004.
DOI : 10.1136/bmj.329.7467.637

L. Moja, I. Moschetti, M. Nurbhai, A. Compagnoni, A. Liberati et al., Compliance of clinical trial registries with the World Health Organization minimum data set: a survey, Trials, vol.2, issue.11, p.56, 2009.
DOI : 10.1371/journal.pmed.0020365

A. Prayle, M. Hurley, and A. Smyth, Compliance with mandatory reporting of clinical trial results on ClinicalTrials.gov: cross sectional study, BMJ, vol.344, issue.jan03 1, p.7373, 2012.
DOI : 10.1136/bmj.d7373

S. Mathieu, I. Boutron, D. Moher, D. Altman, and P. Ravaud, Comparison of Registered and Published Primary Outcomes in Randomized Controlled Trials, JAMA, vol.302, issue.9, pp.977-984, 2009.
DOI : 10.1001/jama.2009.1242

J. Higgins, D. Altman, and J. Sterne, Chapter 8: assessing risk of bias in included studies.I nCochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Version 5 The Cochrane Collaboration, p.79, 2011.

L. Hartling, M. Ospina, Y. Liang, D. Dryden, N. Hooton et al., Risk of bias versus quality assessment of randomised controlled trials: cross sectional study, BMJ, vol.339, issue.oct19 1, p.4012, 2009.
DOI : 10.1136/bmj.b4012

L. Hartling, M. Hamm, A. Milne, B. Vandermeer, P. Santaguida et al., Testing the Risk of Bias tool showed low reliability between individual reviewers and across consensus assessments of reviewer pairs, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, vol.66, issue.9, 2012.
DOI : 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2012.07.005

J. Higgins, C. Ramsay, B. Reeves, J. Deeks, B. Shea et al., Issues relating to study design and risk of bias when including non-randomized studies in systematic reviews on the effects of interventions, Research Synthesis Methods, vol.10, issue.1
DOI : 10.1002/jrsm.1056

S. Norris, D. Moher, B. Reeves, B. Shea, Y. Loke et al., Issues relating to selective reporting when including non-randomized studies in systematic reviews on the effects of healthcare interventions

J. Valentine and S. Thompson, Issues relating to confounding and metaanalysis when including non-randomized studies in systematic reviews on the effects of interventions

J. Deeks, J. Dinnes, D. Amico, R. Sowden, A. Sakarovitch et al., Evaluating non-randomised intervention studies, Health Technology Assessment, vol.7, issue.27, p.173, 2003.
DOI : 10.3310/hta7270
URL : http://researchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/8742/

J. Chandler, M. Clarke, and J. Higgins, Cochrane methods, Cochrane Database Syst Rev, vol.2012, issue.1, pp.1-56
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/inserm-00868808

K. Dwan, D. Altman, L. Cresswell, M. Blundell, C. Gamble et al., Comparison of protocols and registry entries to published reports for randomised controlled trials, Cochrane Database Syst Rev, p.31, 2011.

P. Gotzsche, A. Hrobjartsson, H. Johansen, M. Haahr, D. Altman et al., Constraints on Publication Rights in Industry-Initiated Clinical Trials, JAMA, vol.295, issue.14, pp.1645-1646, 2006.
DOI : 10.1001/jama.295.14.1645

M. Roseman, E. Turner, J. Lexchin, J. Coyne, L. Bero et al., Reporting of conflicts of interest from drug trials in Cochrane reviews: cross sectional study, BMJ, vol.345, issue.aug16 3, p.5155
DOI : 10.1136/bmj.e5155

D. Bassler, M. Briel, V. Montori, M. Lane, P. Glasziou et al., Stopping Randomized Trials Early for Benefit and Estimation of Treatment Effects<subtitle>Systematic Review and Meta-regression Analysis</subtitle>, JAMA, vol.303, issue.12, pp.1180-1187, 2010.
DOI : 10.1001/jama.2010.310

V. Montori, P. Devereaux, N. Adhikari, K. Burns, C. Eggert et al., Randomized Trials Stopped Early for Benefit, JAMA, vol.294, issue.17, pp.2203-2209, 2005.
DOI : 10.1001/jama.294.17.2203

S. Goodman, D. Berry, and J. Wittes, Bias and Trials Stopped Early for Benefit, JAMA, vol.304, issue.2, pp.157-159, 2010.
DOI : 10.1001/jama.2010.931

A. Dechartres, I. Boutron, L. Trinquart, P. Charles, and P. Ravaud, Single-Center Trials Show Larger Treatment Effects Than Multicenter Trials: Evidence From a Meta-epidemiologic Study, Annals of Internal Medicine, vol.155, issue.1, pp.39-51, 2011.
DOI : 10.7326/0003-4819-155-1-201107050-00006

A. Bafeta, A. Dechartres, L. Trinquart, A. Yavchitz, I. Boutron et al., Impact of single centre status on estimates of intervention effects in trials with continuous outcomes: meta-epidemiological study, BMJ, vol.344, issue.feb14 1, p.813
DOI : 10.1136/bmj.e813

S. Ip, N. Hadar, S. Keefe, C. Parkin, R. Iovin et al., A Web-based archive of systematic review data, Systematic Reviews, vol.106, issue.1, p.15, 2012.
DOI : 10.1016/j.jada.2006.10.025

S. Hopewell, I. Boutron, D. Altman, and P. Ravaud, Incorporation of assessments of risk of bias of primary studies in systematic reviews of randomized trials: a cross-sectional review, Journal TBD

R. Turner, D. Spiegelhalter, G. Smith, and S. Thompson, Bias modelling in evidence synthesis, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society), vol.19, issue.1, pp.21-47, 2009.
DOI : 10.1111/j.1467-985X.2008.00547.x

. Turner, The evolution of assessing bias in Cochrane systematic reviews of interventions: celebrating methodological contributions of the Cochrane Collaboration, Systematic Reviews, vol.172, issue.1, p.79, 2013.
DOI : 10.1111/j.1467-985X.2008.00547.x
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/inserm-00871888