K. Schulz, I. Chalmers, R. Hayes, and D. Altman, Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials, JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association, vol.273, issue.5, pp.408-420, 1995.
DOI : 10.1001/jama.273.5.408

J. Higgins, D. Altman, P. Gøtzsche, P. Jüni, D. Moher et al., The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials, BMJ, vol.343, issue.oct18 2, p.5928, 2011.
DOI : 10.1136/bmj.d5928

K. Schulz and D. Grimes, Blinding in randomised trials: hiding who got what, The Lancet, vol.359, issue.9307, pp.696-700, 2002.
DOI : 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)07816-9

I. Boutron, C. Estellat, L. Guittet, A. Dechartres, D. Sackett et al., Methods of Blinding in Reports of Randomized Controlled Trials Assessing Pharmacologic Treatments: A Systematic Review, PLoS Medicine, vol.330, issue.10, p.425, 2006.
DOI : 10.1371/journal.pmed.0030425.sd001
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/inserm-00128342

I. Boutron, L. Guittet, C. Estellat, D. Moher, A. Hróbjartsson et al., Reporting Methods of Blinding in Randomized Trials Assessing Nonpharmacological Treatments, PLoS Medicine, vol.330, issue.2, p.61, 2007.
DOI : 10.1371/journal.pmed.0040061.st003
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/inserm-00166560

S. Horng and F. Miller, Is Placebo Surgery Unethical?, New England Journal of Medicine, vol.347, issue.2, pp.137-146, 2002.
DOI : 10.1056/NEJMsb021025

A. Hróbjartsson, A. Thomsen, F. Emanuelsson, B. Tendal, J. Hilden et al., Observer bias in randomised clinical trials with binary outcomes: systematic review of trials with both blinded and non-blinded outcome assessors, BMJ, vol.344, issue.feb27 2, p.1119, 2012.
DOI : 10.1136/bmj.e1119

D. Sackett, Commentary: Measuring the success of blinding in RCTs: don't, must, can't or needn't?, International Journal of Epidemiology, vol.36, issue.3, pp.664-669, 2007.
DOI : 10.1093/ije/dym088

A. Hróbjartsson, J. Pildal, A. Chan, M. Haahr, D. Altman et al., Reporting on blinding in trial protocols and corresponding publications was often inadequate but rarely contradictory, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, vol.62, issue.9, pp.967-73, 2009.
DOI : 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.04.003

E. Simon and C. , Arthuis a,b,c , F. Perrotin a,b,c a Service de gynécologie obstétrique, médecine foetale et reproduction humaine, CHRU de Tours, vol.2, issue.9