2001-1326-2-1 2001-1326 Research <p>New biomarkers for stage determination in <it>Trypanosoma brucei rhodesiense</it> sleeping sickness patients</p> TibertiNataliaNatalia.Tiberti@unige.ch MatovuEnockmatovue@hotmail.com HainardAlexandreAlexandre.Hainard@unige.ch EnyaruJohn Charlesjenyrau@gmail.com LejonVeerleVLejon@itg.be RobinXavierXavier.Robin@unige.ch TurckNatachaNatacha.Turck@unige.ch NgoyiDieudonné Mumbamumbadieudonne@yahoo.fr KrishnaSanjeevs.krishna@sglu.ac.uk BisserSylviesbisser@hotmail.com CourtiouxBertrandbertrand.courtioux@unilim.fr BüscherPhilippePBuscher@itg.be KristenssonKristerkrister.kristensson@ki.se Ndung'uJoseph Mathujoseph.ndungu@finddiagnostics.org SanchezJean-CharlesJean-Charles.Sanchez@unige.ch

Department of Human Protein Sciences, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland

Department of Biotechnical and Diagnostics Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Animal Resources and Biosecurity, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda

Department of Biochemistry, College of Natural Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda

Department of Biomedical Sciences, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium

Department of Parasitology, Institut National de Recherche Biomédicale, Kinshasa, D. R. Congo

Division of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, St. George’s, University of London, London, Great Britain, UK

INSERM UMR1094, Tropical Neuroepidemiology, Limoges, France

Institute of Neuroepidemiology and Tropical Neurology, University of Limoges, School of Medicine, CNRS FR 3503 GEIST, Limoges, France

Department of Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden

Foundation for Innovative New Diagnostics (FIND), Geneva, Switzerland

Clinical and Translational Medicine
<p>Regular submissions</p>
2001-1326 2013 2 1 1 http://www.clintransmed.com/content/2/1/1 10.1186/2001-1326-2-1
3110201225122012712013 2013Tiberti et al.; licensee Springer.This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Sleeping sickness Biomarkers Trypanosoma brucei rhodesiense Cerebrospinal fluid Stage determination

Abstract

Accurate stage determination is crucial in the choice of treatment for patients suffering from sleeping sickness, also known as human African trypanosomiasis (HAT). Current staging methods, based on the counting of white blood cells (WBC) and the detection of parasites in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) have limited accuracy. We hypothesized that immune mediators reliable for staging T. b. gambiense HAT could also be used to stratify T. b. rhodesiense patients, the less common form of HAT.

A population comprising 85 T. b. rhodesiense patients, 14 stage 1 (S1) and 71 stage 2 (S2) enrolled in Malawi and Uganda, was investigated. The CSF levels of IgM, MMP-9, CXCL13, CXCL10, ICAM-1, VCAM-1, neopterin and B2MG were measured and their staging performances evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses.

IgM, MMP-9 and CXCL13 were the most accurate markers for stage determination (partial AUC 88%, 86% and 85%, respectively). The combination in panels of three molecules comprising CXCL13-CXCL10-MMP-9 or CXCL13-CXCL10-IgM significantly increased their staging ability to partial AUC 94% (p value < 0.01).

The present study highlighted new potential markers for stage determination of T. b. rhodesiense patients. Further investigations are needed to better evaluate these molecules, alone or in panels, as alternatives to WBC to make reliable choice of treatment.

Background

Human African trypanosomiasis (HAT), commonly known as sleeping sickness, is a neglected tropical disease caused by the Trypanosoma brucei parasite and transmitted to humans through the bite of the tsetse fly 1 . Two morphologically identical subspecies of parasites are responsible for the disease: Trypanosoma brucei gambiense and T. b. rhodesiense 2 . In both cases, the disease progresses from a haemolymphatic first stage (S1), to a meningo-encephalitic second stage (S2). The latter reflects invasion of the central nervous system (CNS) by the parasites across the blood–brain barrier (BBB) with severe neurological complications, which can ultimately lead to coma and death, when untreated 3 . The two forms of HAT differ in their clinical presentations and geographic distribution. The gambiense form is widespread in Central and Western Africa and is commonly considered to be a chronic infection, which slowly progresses from the first to the second stage. The rhodesiense form of sleeping sickness, that affects communities in Eastern Africa, is a more aggressive illness, which rapidly progresses to the meningo-encephalitic stage 3 and accounts for less than 5% of all HAT cases 4 . Contrary to T. b. gambiense, for which a relatively safe drug combination has recently been introduced for treatment of S2 patients 4 5 6 , treatment of S2 T. b. rhodesiense patients still relies on melarsoprol 7 8 9 . Melarsoprol has been reported to cause reactive encephalopathies in 8% of T. b. rhodesiense treated patients, which are fatal in 57% of them 8 . As a drug to safely treat both stage 1 and stage 2 patients is yet to be identified, and as S2 treatment is associated with severe side effects and toxicity 8 , stage determination remains a key step in the management of patients suffering from T. b. rhodesiense HAT.

Staging is based on the examination of the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) by microscopy. According to WHO, patients having ≤ 5 white blood cells (WBC) per microliter of CSF and absence of parasites are considered to be in the first stage of the disease, while patients having more than 5 WBC/μL and/or presence of parasites in the CSF are considered as S2 10 . These methods suffer from limited specificity and reproducibility of the counting of WBC and lack of sensitivity in finding of parasites in CSF 11 12 (Dieudonné Mumba Ngoyi, personal communication).

The discovery of surrogate markers to complement or replace the counting of WBC in the staging of HAT is highly desired 11 13 14 . Many studies have focused on the staging in T. b. gambiense HAT 13 15 16 17 18 19 20 , while less attention has been paid to T. b. rhodesiense, with a paucity of data on staging markers 13 21 22 . Some pro- and anti-inflammatory factors have been shown to be associated with the late stage of T. b. rhodesiense sleeping sickness, including IL-10, IL-6, CXCL10 and neopterin 13 21 22 .

The aim of the present study was to investigate eight immune-related factors, shown to be powerful markers for stratification of T. b. gambiense HAT patients 13 15 16 17 18 19 20 23 , as staging markers for T. b. rhodesiense sleeping sickness.

Methods

Patients

Eighty five patients (14 stage 1 and 71 stage 2) with evidence of parasites in blood, lymph or CSF were investigated in the present study (Table 1). Patients were enrolled by active or passive case finding in Malawi (NEUROTRYP study 13 ) and Uganda (FINDTRYP study), in regions endemic for T. b. rhodesiense HAT. The studies were approved by the Ministry of Health and Population, Lilongwe, Malawi and by the Uganda National Council for Science and Technology (UNCST).

<p>Table 1</p>

Stage 1 (n=14)

Stage 2 (n=71)

* Fisher’s exact test, no significant differences.

† Mann–Whitney U test, no significant differences.

Demography

Sex, F (n)*

7

32

Age, years [mean ± SD]

37.1 [± 19.3]

36.9 [± 15.8]

Geographical origin

Malawi, n

3

27

Uganda, n

11

44

CSF examinations

Trypanosome positive, n

0

64

WBC/μL (median, range)

3 [2–5]

21 [4–1140]

Pre-treatment characteristics of the investigated patients

All patients signed a written informed consent before inclusion into the study. Children (< 18 years old) or patients with altered mental status were only included in the studies after written consent of a parent or a guardian. All enrolled patients had the possibility to withdraw at any moment. Details on sample collection, inclusion and exclusion criteria of the two cohorts are reported in Additional file 1: Table 1.

<p>Additional file 1</p>

Table 1. Details of the studies from which samples were obtained. Table 2. Detailed calculation for the evaluation of the staging ability of the eight markers. Figure 1. Comparison of the levels of the markers between stage 1 (S1) and stage 2 (S2) T.b. rhodesiense patients classified according to the country of sample collection. For each country, differences between S1 and S2 were assessed using the Mann-Whiney U test. * corresponds to a p value < 0.05; ** corresponds to a p value < 0.001; *** corresponds to a p value < 0.0001.

Click here for file

CSF samples were collected by lumbar puncture and the number of WBC counted. The presence of parasites was determined using either the modified single centrifugation (Malawi) 24 or double centrifugation (Uganda) 25 methods. CSF samples were stored in liquid nitrogen at the site of collection, followed by storage at −80°C. Patients were diagnosed, staged and treated for HAT according to the guidelines of the national sleeping sickness control program of the country of sample collection.

In the present study, patients’ stage was assigned according to WHO recommendations 10 , i.e., stage 1 when CSF WBC ≤ 5/μL and absence of parasite in CSF, stage 2 when CSF WBC > 5/μL and/or parasites detected in the CSF. Patients were excluded when information to classify them according to these criteria was not available.

Immunoassays

The levels of the markers were measured in pre-treatment CSF using commercially available immunoassays (ELISA or multiplex bead suspension assay) following manufacturers’ instructions as reported elsewhere 23 . These included IgM (ICL, OR, USA), B2MG (Calbiotech, CA, USA), neopterin (BRAHMS, Germany), CXCL10 (Bio-Rad, CA, USA), VCAM-1, ICAM-1, CXCL13 and MMP-9 (R&D Systems, UK).

Statistics

Statistical analyses were performed using IBM SPSS Statistics version 20.0.0 (IBM, NY, USA). Comparisons between groups were performed using the Mann–Whitney U test, setting the level of significance at 0.05. Correlations between molecules and the number of WBC were assessed through the Spearman correlation rho coefficient. ROC analyses were performed using pROC package for S+ version 8.1 (TIBCO, Software Inc.) 26 . All tests were two-tailed.

To assess the staging ability of each marker and to compare their performances at high specificity, corrected partial areas under the ROC curves (pAUC) were calculated between 90 and 100% of specificity (SP) 26 . A cut-off corresponding to 100% specificity was also computed.

To evaluate the power of the markers in predicting the presence of trypanosomes in CSF, patients were classified based on the absence (n=21) or presence (n=64) of parasites in their CSF. Complete AUC were then computed as well as the cut-off corresponding to the best combination of specificity (SP) and sensitivity (SE).

Panels of markers were obtained using an in-house software, PanelomiX, based on a method of optimization of cut-off values by iterative combination of biomarkers and thresholds (rule-induction-like method) 18 . Highly specific combinations of three molecules were computed. Those showing the highest pAUC for discrimination between stage 1 and stage 2 patients were kept. Statistical comparison between the pAUC of the panels and those of the individual markers was obtained through the Bootstrap test for two correlated ROC curves.

Results

Concentration of markers in patients’ CSF

The CSF levels of IgM, B2MG, MMP-9, CXCL13, CXCL10, ICAM-1, VCAM-1 and neopterin were measured on a population of 85 patients, comprising 14 stage 1 and 71 stage 2 (Table 1).

All molecules showed a higher CSF concentration in S2 patients compared to S1. IgM, MMP-9 and CXCL13 showed the highest fold increase (S2/S1 concentration ratio of 68, 12 and 187, respectively). However, the comparison using the Mann–Whitney U test, highlighted significant differences between the two stages for all markers (Table 2). These differences were confirmed when patients from Uganda (S1 n=11; S2 n=44) were considered separately, while only MMP-9, IgM and B2MG could significantly discriminate between Malawian S1 (n=3) and S2 (n=27) patients (Additional Figure 1). Furthermore, all markers significantly correlated (Spearman correlation) with the number of WBC counted in the CSF, the current staging method, with MMP-9, CXCL13 and CXCL10 having a rho coefficient > 0.5 (Table 2).

<p>Table 2</p>

Marker

[S1], median

[S2], median

[S2]/[S1]

p value*

Spearman rho

* Mann–Whitney U test.

† Correlation between the number of CSF WBC and CSF levels for each marker. Correlation was significant at 0.01 level.

IgM [μg/mL]

0.96

65.4

68.1

<0.0001

0.491

MMP-9 [pg/mL]

108.6

1309.9

12.1

<0.0001

0.554

CXCL13 [pg/mL]

8.2

1531.2

186.7

<0.0001

0.529

VCAM-1 [ng/mL]

22.6

67.3

3.0

<0.0001

0.372

B2MG [ng/mL]

964

3447

3.6

<0.0001

0.426

ICAM-1 [ng/mL]

1.99

9.6

4.8

<0.0001

0.457

Neopterin [nmol/L]

41.2

112.9

2.7

0.001

0.360

CXCL10 [ng/mL]

8.9

41.9

4.7

0.005

0.508

Concentration of markers in early (S1) and late (S2) stage T.b. rhodesiense patients

<p>Figure 1</p>

ROC curves representing the staging abilities of the eight markers

ROC curves representing the staging abilities of the eight markers. Dark gray areas represent the corrected pAUC between 90 and 100% of specificity obtained for each marker. Light gray zones represent a pAUC of 100%. The value of the cut-off corresponding to 100% specificity comprised within the pAUC is reported on each graph together with the corresponding sensitivity% (SE%). Additional results are reported in Additional file 1: Table 2.

Staging ability of the markers

ROC analyses were performed to further assess the ability of the markers to discriminate between S1 and S2 patients in terms of specificity and sensitivity.

To highlight markers able to correctly rule out the highest number of S1 patients, partial AUC between 90 and 100% of specificity were calculated together with a cut-off in marker concentration at 100% of SP (Figure 1, Additional file 1: Table 2).

IgM, MMP-9 and CXCL13 had a pAUC higher than 80%, but for 100% of specificity IgM showed higher sensitivity (SE 77%, 76.6-87.3 95% CI), compared to MMP-9 (72% SE, 60.6-81-7 95% CI) and CXCL13 (69% SE, 57.8-80.3 95% CI).

A second group of markers with a pAUC between 70-80% comprised VCAM-1, B2MG, ICAM-1 and neopterin. CXCL10 was highlighted as the less accurate marker, with a pAUC of only 55% and 3% sensitivity for 100% specificity.

To further assess the ability of the eight molecules to identify patients with advanced S2 HAT, patients were classified based on the absence (T-, n=21) or the presence (T+, n=64) of parasites in the CSF. The total area under the ROC curve was considered. All markers, except neopterin and CXCL10, discriminated between T- and T+ patients with AUC > 80% and with performances comparable to those of WBC (95% CI around AUC overlapping) (Table 3).

<p>Table 3</p>

Marker

p value*

AUC% (95% CI)

Cut-off

SP% (95% CI)

SE% (95% CI)

Patients without parasites detected in CSF, n=21; patients with parasite detected in CSF, n=64.

* Mann–Whitney U test.

SP% = specificity%; SE% = sensitivity%; 95% CI = 95% confidence interval.

IgM [μg/mL]

< 0.0001

84.5 (73.9-95.2)

17.8

85.7 (66.7-100)

81.3 (71.9-90.6)

MMP-9 [pg/mL]

< 0.0001

85.2 (74.3-96)

499.8

90.5 (76.2-100)

76.6 (65.6-85.9)

CXCL13 [pg/mL]

< 0.0001

80.4 (69.1-91.8)

200.3

90.5 (76.2-100)

73.4 (62.5-84.4)

VCAM-1 [ng/mL]

< 0.0001

83.2 (73.7-92.7)

43.9

76.2 (57.1-90.5)

78.1 (67.2-87.5)

B2MG [ng/mL]

< 0.0001

82.0 (71.3-92.7)

1462

66.7 (47.6-85.7)

85.9 (76.6-93.8)

ICAM-1 [ng/mL]

< 0.0001

83.3 (73–93.6)

4.7

81.0 (61.9-95.2)

73.4 (62.5-84.4)

Neopterin [nmol/L]

< 0.0001

75.5 (63.9-87.1)

69.4

81.0 (61.9-95.2)

65.6 (54.7-76.6)

CXCL10 [ng/mL]

0.002

73.1 (59.3-86.8)

7.5

47.6 (28.6-66.7)

92.2 (84.4-98.4)

WBC (Cells/μL)

< 0.0001

87.4 (77.4-97.4)

6.5

71.4 (52.4-90.5)

95.3 (89.1-100)

Ability of markers to classify T.b. rhodesiense patients according to the presence of parasites in CSF

Interestingly, when the specificity and sensitivity corresponding to the best cut-off were taken into account, the three best markers, i.e. IgM, MMP-9 and CXCL13, turned out to be more specific (SP > 85%) than WBC, which in turn was more sensitive (SE > 95%) (Table 3).

Combination of markers into panels

To evaluate whether a combination of markers could increase the staging ability, panels of three molecules corresponding to 100% specificity were calculated. Two different combinations showing the same staging performances (pAUC 94%, 89.9-97.3 95% CI; SE 87.3%, 78.9-94.4 95% CI) were obtained. Both panels comprised CXCL10 (cut-off 2.24 ng/mL) and CXCL13 (cut-off 23.3 pg/mL) in combination with either MMP-9 (cut-off 499.8 pg/mL) or IgM (cut-off 17.8 μg/mL) (Table 4). Both panels were considered positive when at least two out of three molecules were above their cut-offs.

<p>Table 4</p>

Panel

Markers

Cut-off

pAUC% (95% CI)*

SE% (95%CI)*

p value

* pAUC and SE% were calculated for 100% SP.

† Comparison between the pAUC (90-100% SP) of the panel and those of the markers individually considered obtained through the Bootstrap test for two correlated ROC curves.

Both panels are positive when ≥2 molecules are above their cut-off.

1

CXCL10 [ng/mL]

2.2

94 (89.9-97.3)

87.3 (78.9-94.4)

0.0001

CXCL13 [pg/mL]

23.3

0.01

MMP-9 [pg/mL]

499.8

0.01

2

CXCL10 [ng/mL]

2.2

94 (89.9-97.3)

87.3 (78.9-94.4)

0.0001

CXCL13 [pg/mL]

23.3

0.01

IgM [μg/mL]

17.8

0.02

Panels of markers for staging T.b. rhodesiense patients obtained through a combination of 3 molecules

When compared to the individual molecules, the two panels were significantly more accurate for stage determination (Bootstrap test for two correlated ROC curves, p<0.05). These combinations enabled the correct classification of all S1 patients (100% SP) and 62 out of 71 S2 patients (87% SE).

Discussion

Stage determination in T. b. rhodesiense sleeping sickness patients is a critical step in ensuring that the appropriate treatment is used 14 . An imperfect gold standard for staging and the lack of a safe S2 drug highlight the need for new tools for staging this form of disease 27 28 . In the present study we investigated, on a small population of patients suffering from T. b. rhodesiense HAT, a number of molecules (MMP-9, CXCL10, CXCL13, IgM, neopterin, ICAM-1, VCAM-1 and B2MG) known to be over-expressed in the CSF of late stage T. b. gambiense patients 23 . Since melarsoprol is still the only treatment for S2 rhodesiense patients, we evaluated their staging ability as highly specific markers, to try to limit unnecessary exposure of patients to this toxic drug. IgM, MMP-9 and CXCL13 were shown to be the most accurate discriminators between early and late stage disease (pAUC ≥ 85%) and showed the same accuracy as WBC in distinguishing between patients having parasites in their CSF from those without. Furthermore, combination of the molecules into panels of three markers (IgM-CXCL13-CXCL10 or MMP-9-CXCL13-CXCL10) significantly increased the staging accuracy, leading to the correct classification of all S1 patients and 62 out of 71 S2 patients.

All the markers investigated here are known to be involved in the immune response elicited by the presence of the parasite in the host. Interestingly, a different behavior of the 8 molecules was observed in T. b. gambiense patients, which may reflect the differences in immunopathogenesis 29 and clinical presentation 3 30 of the two forms of HAT. It has already been proposed, for example, that different activation pathways of macrophages and astrocytes may take place in the two forms of HAT 22 . Such differences may be responsible of the less accurate staging ability of neopterin on T. b. rhodesiense patients, compared to its very high staging power on T. b. gambiense patients.

The role of IgM, the best individual marker in the present study, in disease progression has been extensively studied. An increased CSF concentration of IgM of intrathecal origin was shown to be a good indicator of brain involvement in HAT 15 , leading to the development of a rapid latex agglutination test (Latex/IgM) for stage determination in the field 31 . However, when assessed under field conditions, this assay did not represent an advantage compared to counting of WBC 31 . Furthermore, when used for evaluation of the outcome after treatment, IgM levels were not an optimal indicator of recovery due to their slow normalization 32 . Studies in animal models have shown that HAT meningo-encephalitis is characterized by an increased number of leukocytes in the CNS 33 . CXCL13, also known as BCA-1, is a chemokine mainly produced by dendritic cells 34 , which specifically attracts B and T lymphocytes to the site of inflammation 35 . Its over-expression in CSF has been associated with increased WBC and intrathecal production of immunoglobulins in many pathological conditions 36 37 , including late stage T. b. gambiense HAT 19 . On the other hand, MMP-9 (matrix-metalloproteinase 9), an enzyme involved in tissue homeostasis and remodeling 38 39 , has been extensively studied in a number of pathologies affecting the CNS 39 40 41 42 , in addition to T. b. gambiense HAT 17 . Due to its ability to degrade β-dystroglycan, this protein has been proposed to be involved in the passage of leukocytes through the glia limitans to reach the brain parenchyma 43 . However, the temporal relationship between the events leading to CNS invasion and the appearance of various signs and symptoms of nervous system dysfunction needs to be investigated further.

The markers investigated in the present study were combined into panels in order to increase their accuracy in stage determination. The utility of this approach to achieve a better diagnostic accuracy has already been shown 18 44 . Using this method, we highlighted highly specific combinations comprising CXCL13, CXCL10 and MMP-9 or IgM. Interestingly, CXCL10 was present in both panels. This molecule was not efficient in staging T. b. rhodesiense patients when considered individually. However, when combined to CXCL13 and MMP-9 or IgM, it helped in reaching a significantly increased staging accuracy. This chemokine, which specifically attracts T lymphocytes to the site of inflammation 45 , was reported to be produced by activated astrocytes in trypanosome-infected mice 46 . The activation of astrocytes and macrophages are early events in stage 2 infection 47 48 49 , suggesting that CXCL10 may represent an early indicator of CNS involvement in HAT.

Interestingly, the markers did not show the same staging performances when assessed on patients classified according to their geographic origin (i.e. Malawi or Uganda). Although the low number of Malawian S1 patients (n=3) certainly represents a bias and may be responsible for the differences observed, this result could reflect the variable clinical presentation of rhodesiense disease observed in different foci 27 . This may suggest that potentially different markers will be needed to stage T. b. rhodesiense patients according to their geographical origin and the parasite strain.

The present study has a number of limitations that should be considered. First, the data presented resulted from analyses on a small number of patients. This is a common problem associated to the investigation of this form of HAT. Collecting samples from T. b. rhodesiense patients is considerably difficult, not only due to the lower incidence of this disease compared to the gambiense form, but also as a consequence of a less effective active screening, since the CATT test can only detect T. b. gambiense cases 50 . To further evaluate the staging properties of the markers, larger cohorts of patients should be investigated. Moreover, due to the reported differences between T. b. rhodesiense HAT among foci, the results presented here should be validated in a more controlled set of patients (i.e. in which the same parasitological examinations were performed).

Another drawback could be represented by the choice of selecting highly specific markers, with the consequence of compromising the sensitivity. Management of T. b. rhodesiense patients is far from being optimal, thus both choices of high specificity or sensitivity would be associated either to a risk of missing the diagnosis of late stage patients, or to the exposure of S1 patients to a highly toxic stage 2 drug, respectively. However, it should be emphasized that a new staging biomarker for rhodesiense HAT would be combined with the detection of parasites in CSF, which would increase the sensitivity, and with clinical evaluation of the neurological status of the patients.

The absence of information on neurological signs exhibited by patients in the present study prevented an efficient assessment of the association between the levels of the markers and the signs of CNS involvement. This aspect is particularly important in the light of a recent publication on T. b. rhodesiense HAT reporting the poor association between disease progression, the levels of a number of cytokines and patients’ neurological manifestations 51 .

The 8 markers investigated here behaved differently when assessed on T. b. gambiense or T. b. rhodesiense samples, underlining the differences between the two forms of disease, and suggesting that potentially new rhodesiense-specific markers could be discovered.

Despite the high staging accuracy shown by the combinations of markers described in the present study (i.e. CXCL10-CXCL13-MMP-9 and CXCL10-CXCL13-IgM), their translation into a rapid field diagnostic test could be difficult, due to a potential increase in the costs of production, suggesting that deeper investigations should be performed. The individual staging power of the molecules should be assessed on a larger cohort of T. b. rhodesiense HAT patients, including CSF samples collected during the post-therapeutic follow-up, and the possibility of their translation into a point-of-care test for stage determination in the field should be evaluated. Furthermore, their study in animal models, as already done for IL-10 52 , could help in the further characterization of the role of these markers in disease progression.

Conclusions

The results presented in this work on T. b. rhodesiense sleeping sickness highlight the potential utility of IgM, MMP-9 and CXCL13, alone or combined with CXCL10 in staging patients. We believe that this work has paved the way for further investigations on the role of these markers in detecting the meningo-encephalitic stage of T. b. rhodesiense HAT, and therefore making a more accurate choice of treatment.

Abbreviations

HAT: Human African trypanosomiasis; WBC: White blood cells; CSF: Cerebrospinal fluid; ROC: Receiver operating characteristic; AUC: Area under the ROC curve; pAUC: Partial AUC; S1: Stage 1; S2: Stage2; CNS: Central nervous system; WHO: World health organisation; NECT: Nifurtimox-eflornithine combination therapy; SP: Specificity; SE: Sensitivity; CI: Confidence interval.

Competing interests

Joseph Ndung’u is an employee of the Foundation for Innovative New Diagnostics (FIND). Veerle Lejon, Philippe Büscher and Sanjeev Krishna were consultants for FIND at the time of the study. All other authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

NTi, AH, JCS, VL, JMN conceived and designed the experiments. NTi and AH performed the experiments. NTi, AH, JCS, NTu and XR analyzed the data. EM, JCE, DMN, PB, VL and KK collected samples. VL, SK, JMN, PB, KK helped in data interpretation. All authors have either participated in writing or reviewing of the manuscript.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Noémie Fumeaux for technical assistance. Support for this research project was provided through funding from the Foundation for Innovative New Diagnostics (FIND). The views expressed by the authors do not necessarily reflect the views of the funding agency. Specimen collection in Uganda was supported by FIND; part of the specimen collection in Malawi was supported by a grant from the European Union [FP6-2004-INCO-DEV-3 032334; NEUROTRYP].

<p>Cytokines in central nervous system trypanosomiasis: cause, effect or both?</p>KennedyPGTrans R Soc Trop Med Hyg200910321321410.1016/j.trstmh.2008.08.01318814893<p>A spectrum of disease in human African trypanosomiasis: the host and parasite genetics of virulence</p>SternbergJMMacleanLParasitology20101372007201510.1017/S003118201000094620663245MalvyDChappuisFSleeping sickness. Clin Microbiol Infect20111798699510.1111/j.1469-0691.2011.03536.x<p>The human African trypanosomiasis control and surveillance programme of the World Health Organization 2000–2009: the way forward</p>SimarroPPDiarraARuiz PostigoJAFrancoJRJanninJGPLoS Negl Trop Dis20115e100710.1371/journal.pntd.0001007304299921364972<p>Nifurtimox-eflornithine combination therapy for second-stage African <it>Trypanosoma brucei gambiense</it> trypanosomiasis: a multicentre, randomised, phase III, non-inferiority trial</p>PriottoGKasparianSMutomboWNgouamaDGhorashianSArnoldUGhabriSBaudinEBuardVKazadi-KyanzaSLancet2009374566410.1016/S0140-6736(09)61117-X19559476<p>Update on field use of the available drugs for the chemotherapy of human African trypanosomiasis</p>SimarroPPFrancoJDiarraAPostigoJAJanninJParasitology201213984284610.1017/S003118201200016922309684<p>An alternative form of melarsoprol in sleeping sickness</p>KennedyPGTrends Parasitol20122830731010.1016/j.pt.2012.05.00322704910<p>Chemotherapy against human African trypanosomiasis: is there a road to success?</p>BurriCParasitology20101371987199410.1017/S003118201000113720961469<p>Safety and efficacy of the 10-day melarsoprol schedule for the treatment of second stage rhodesiense sleeping sickness</p>KuepferISchmidCAllanMEdieluAHaaryEPKakemboAKibonaSBlumJBurriCPLoS Negl Trop Dis20126e169510.1371/journal.pntd.0001695343513322970329<p>Control and surveillance of African trypanosomiasis. Report of a WHO Expert Committee</p>WHOWorld Health Organ Tech Rep Ser1998881I-VI1114<p>Diagnosing central nervous system trypanosomiasis: two stage or not to stage?</p>KennedyPGTrans R Soc Trop Med Hyg200810230630710.1016/j.trstmh.2007.11.01118187172<p>Eliminating human African trypanosomiasis: where do we stand and what comes next?</p>SimarroPPJanninJCattandPPLoS Med20085e5510.1371/journal.pmed.0050055225361218303943<p>Identification of stage biomarkers for human African trypanosomiasis</p>AminDNNgoyiDMNhkwachiGMPalombaMRottenbergMBuscherPKristenssonKMasochaWAm J Trop Med Hyg20108298399010.4269/ajtmh.2010.09-0770287743820519589<p>The continuing problem of human African trypanosomiasis (sleeping sickness)</p>KennedyPGAnn Neurol20086411612610.1002/ana.2142918756506<p>Intrathecal immune response pattern for improved diagnosis of central nervous system involvement in trypanosomiasis</p>LejonVReiberHLegrosDDjeNMagnusEWoutersISindicCJBuscherPJ Infect Dis20031871475148310.1086/37464512717630<p>Discovery and verification of osteopontin and Beta-2-microglobulin as promising markers for staging human African trypanosomiasis</p>TibertiNHainardALejonVRobinXNgoyiDMTurckNMatovuEEnyaruJNdung'uJMScherlAMol Cell Proteomics201092783279510.1074/mcp.M110.001008310186220724469<p>Matrix metalloproteinase-9 and intercellular adhesion molecule 1 are powerful staging markers for human African trypanosomiasis</p>HainardATibertiNRobinXNgoyiDMMatovuEEnyaruJCMullerMTurckNNdung'uJMLejonVSanchezJCTrop Med Int Health20111611912610.1111/j.1365-3156.2010.02642.x20958893<p>A combined CXCL10, CXCL8 and H-FABP panel for the staging of human African trypanosomiasis patients</p>HainardATibertiNRobinXLejonVNgoyiDMMatovuEEnyaruJCFoudaCNdung'uJMLisacekFPLoS Negl Trop Dis20093e45910.1371/journal.pntd.0000459269617819554086<p>Increased CXCL-13 levels in human African trypanosomiasis meningo-encephalitis</p>CourtiouxBPervieuxLVatungaGMarinBJosenandoTJauberteau-MarchanMOBouteilleBBisserSTrop Med Int Health20091452953410.1111/j.1365-3156.2009.02263.x19298637<p>Blood-cerebrospinal fluid barrier and intrathecal immunoglobulins compared to field diagnosis of central nervous system involvement in sleeping sickness</p>BisserSLejonVPreuxPMBouteilleBStanghelliniAJauberteauMOBuscherPDumasMJ Neurol Sci200219312713510.1016/S0022-510X(01)00655-411790393<p>Nitric oxide and cytokine synthesis in human African trypanosomiasis</p>MacLeanLOdiitMSternbergJMJ Infect Dis20011841086109010.1086/32347911574928<p>Intrathecal cytokine responses in <it>Trypanosoma brucei rhodesiense</it> sleeping sickness patients</p>MacleanLOdiitMSternbergJMTrans R Soc Trop Med Hyg200610027027510.1016/j.trstmh.2005.03.01316343570<p>Cerebrospinal fluid neopterin as marker of the meningo-encephalitic stage of <it>Trypanosoma brucei gambiense</it> sleeping sickness</p>TibertiNHainardALejonVCourtiouxBMatovuEEnyaruJCRobinXTurckNKristenssonKNgoyiDMPLoS One20127e4090910.1371/journal.pone.0040909339980822815865<p>Single centrifugation of cerebrospinal fluid in a sealed pasteur pipette for simple, rapid and sensitive detection of trypanosomes</p>MiezanTWMedaHADouaFDjeNNLejonVBuscherPTrans R Soc Trop Med Hyg20009429310.1016/S0035-9203(00)90327-410975002<p>Human African trypanosomiasis: use of double centrifugation of cerebrospinal fluid to detect trypanosomes</p>CattandPMiezanBTde RaadtPBull World Health Organ198866838624911063260146<p>pROC: an open-source package for R and S+ to analyze and compare ROC curves</p>RobinXTurckNHainardATibertiNLisacekFSanchezJCMullerMBMC Bioinformatics2011127710.1186/1471-2105-12-77306897521414208<p>Focus-specific clinical profiles in human African Trypanosomiasis caused by <it>Trypanosoma brucei rhodesiense</it></p>MacLeanLMOdiitMChisiJEKennedyPGSternbergJMPLoS Negl Trop Dis20104e90610.1371/journal.pntd.0000906299843121151878<p>Difficulties in diagnostic staging of human African trypanosomiasis</p>KennedyPGJ Neuroparasitol2011213<p>Diagnostic and neuropathogenesis issues in human African trypanosomiasis</p>KennedyPGInt J Parasitol20063650551210.1016/j.ijpara.2006.01.01216546191<p>Will the real <it>Trypanosoma brucei rhodesiense</it> please step forward?</p>GibsonWTrends Parasitol20021848649010.1016/S1471-4922(02)02390-512473364<p>IgM quantification in the cerebrospinal fluid of sleeping sickness patients by a latex card agglutination test</p>LejonVLegrosDRicherMRuizJAJamonneauVTrucPDouaFDjeNN'SiesiFXBisserSTrop Med Int Health2002768569210.1046/j.1365-3156.2002.00917.x12167095<p>Novel markers for treatment outcome in late-stage <it>Trypanosoma brucei gambiense trypanosomiasis</it></p>LejonVRogerIMumba NgoyiDMentenJRobaysJN'SiesiFXBisserSBoelaertMBuscherPClin Infect Dis200847152210.1086/58866818494605RodgersJTrypanosomiasis and the brain. Parasitology20101371995200610.1017/S0031182009991806<p>Lymphoid chemokines in the CNS</p>LalorSJSegalBMJ Neuroimmunol2010224566110.1016/j.jneuroim.2010.05.017291021020605642<p>A B-cell-homing chemokine made in lymphoid follicles activates Burkitt's lymphoma receptor-1</p>GunnMDNgoVNAnselKMEklandEHCysterJGWilliamsLTNature199839179980310.1038/358769486651<p>Chemokines in multiple sclerosis: CXCL12 and CXCL13 up-regulation is differentially linked to CNS immune cell recruitment</p>KrumbholzMTheilDCepokSHemmerBKivisakkPRansohoffRMHofbauerMFarinaCDerfussTHartleCBrain200612920021116280350<p>The lymphoid chemokine, CXCL13, is dispensable for the initial recruitment of B cells to the acutely inflamed central nervous system</p>Rainey-BargerEKRumbleJMLalorSJEsenNSegalBMIraniDNBrain Behav Immun20112592293110.1016/j.bbi.2010.10.002313596820933590<p>MMP9: a novel function in synaptic plasticity</p>DziembowskaMWlodarczykJInt J Biochem Cell Biol20124470971310.1016/j.biocel.2012.01.02322326910<p>Matrix metalloproteinase-9 as a marker for acute ischemic stroke: a systematic review</p>Ramos-FernandezMBellolioMFSteadLGJ Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis201120475410.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2009.10.00821044610<p>Matrix metalloproteinase-7 and matrix metalloproteinase-9 in pediatric multiple sclerosis</p>UnsalYKivilcimGAysegulAArzuAEsraGErcanDAyseSPediatr Neurol20124717117610.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2012.05.02722883281<p>Matrix metalloproteinase-9 and haemozoin: wedding rings for human host and <it>Plasmodium falciparum</it> parasite in complicated malaria</p>PratoMGiribaldiGJ Trop Med20112011628435313421621760809<p>Glial activation and matrix metalloproteinase release in cerebral malaria</p>SzklarczykAStinsMMilwardEARyuHFitzsimmonsCSullivanDConantKJ Neurovirol20071321010.1080/1355028070125808417454443<p>Dystroglycan is selectively cleaved at the parenchymal basement membrane at sites of leukocyte extravasation in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis</p>AgrawalSAndersonPDurbeejMvan RooijenNIvarsFOpdenakkerGSorokinLMJ Exp Med20062031007101910.1084/jem.20051342211828016585265<p>Bioinformatics for protein biomarker panel classification: what is needed to bring biomarker panels into <it>in vitro</it> diagnostics?</p>RobinXTurckNHainardALisacekFSanchezJCMullerMExpert Rev Proteomics2009667568910.1586/epr.09.8319929612<p>Binding and functional properties of recombinant and endogenous CXCR3 chemokine receptors</p>WengYSicilianoSJWaldburgerKESirotina-MeisherAStaruchMJDaughertyBLGouldSLSpringerMSDeMartinoJAJ Biol Chem1998273182881829110.1074/jbc.273.29.182889660793<p>Expression and role of CXCL10 during the encephalitic stage of experimental and clinical African trypanosomiasis</p>AminDNRottenbergMEThomsenARMumbaDFengerCKristenssonKBuscherPFinsenBMasochaWJ Infect Dis20092001556156510.1086/64459719827943<p>African trypanosome infections of the nervous system: parasite entry and effects on sleep and synaptic functions</p>KristenssonKNygardMBertiniGBentivoglioMProg Neurobiol20109115217110.1016/j.pneurobio.2009.12.00119995590<p>Human African trypanosomiasis of the CNS: current issues and challenges</p>KennedyPGJ Clin Invest200411349650433826914966556<p>Astrocyte activation correlates with cytokine production in central nervous system of <it>Trypanosoma brucei brucei</it>-infected mice</p>HunterCAJenningsFWKennedyPGMurrayMLab Invest1992676356421434541<p>Options for field diagnosis of human African trypanosomiasis</p>ChappuisFLoutanLSimarroPLejonVBuscherPClin Microbiol Rev20051813314610.1128/CMR.18.1.133-146.200554418115653823<p>Stage progression and neurological symptoms in <it>Trypanosoma brucei rhodesiense</it> sleeping sickness: role of the CNS inflammatory response</p>MacleanLReiberHKennedyPGSternbergJMPLoS Negl Trop Dis20126e185710.1371/journal.pntd.0001857349338123145191<p>Immunospecific immunoglobulins and IL-10 as markers for <it>Trypanosoma brucei rhodesiense</it> late stage disease in experimentally infected vervet monkeys</p>NgothoMKagiraJMJensenHEKaranjaSMFarahIOHauJTrop Med Int Health20091473674710.1111/j.1365-3156.2009.02285.x19573160