s'authentifier
version française rss feed
Fiche concise
(Why patient consent is not to be neglected?).
Moutel G.
Gynecol Obstet Fertil 40, 11 (2012) 698-700 - http://www.hal.inserm.fr/inserm-00753378
(23099022)
[Why patient consent is not to be neglected?].
Grégoire Moutel () 1, 2
1 :  LEM - Laboratoire d'éthique médicale et médecine légale
Université Paris V - Paris Descartes
Faculté de médecine, 45 rue des Saints-Pères, Paris 75006
France
2 :  Unité de médecine sociale
Assistance publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP) – Groupe hospitalier Corentin Celton-HEGP
4, parvis Corentin-Celton, 92130 Issy-les-Moulineaux cedex
France
Observation of medical practices still show that, in some institutions, obtaining consent could be in the mode of a trivialization, or even some administrative automaticity. To ensure a truly informed choice, this article explains why the information in the sensitive field of reproductive medicine and perinatology should remain an act of care and relationship. It outlines why medical information issued to couples must take into account not only validated data, but also the doubts and uncertainties. This is especially true when risk management because the meaning we give to the acceptance of risk is not simply the result of a calcul of probability but also the result of a social construction. All signed consent and collected outside of such an approach to quality and completeness of the information would be considered questionable.
Sciences du Vivant/Ethique
Français
1769-6682

Articles dans des revues avec comité de lecture
10.1016/j.gyobfe.2012.09.034
Gynecol Obstet Fertil
internationale
11/2012
23/10/2012
40
11
698-700

informed consent – physician-patient relationship – risk management – obstetric – prenatal diagnosis
Liste des fichiers attachés à ce document : 
PDF
sfef.pdf(178.7 KB)