G. Jerusalem, N. Withofs, A. Rorive, and R. Hustinx, Positron emission tomography in oncology: an update, La Revue Du Praticien, issue.17, pp.571864-1870, 2007.

W. Römer, A. Hanauske, . Ziegler, . Thödtmann, C. Weber et al., Positron emission tomography in Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma : Assessment of chemotherapy with fluorodeoxyglucose, Blood, issue.12, pp.914464-4471, 1998.

H. Jarritt, K. Carson, A. R. Hounsel, and D. Visvikis, The role of PET/CT scanning in radiotherapy planning, The British Journal of Radiology, vol.79, issue.special_issue_1, pp.27-35, 2006.
DOI : 10.1259/bjr/35628509

W. Weber, Assessing Tumor Response to Therapy, Journal of Nuclear Medicine, vol.50, issue.Suppl_1, pp.1-10, 2009.
DOI : 10.2967/jnumed.108.057174

URL : http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.482.9219

F. Day, E. Link, S. Ngan, T. Leong, K. Moodie et al., FDG-PET metabolic response predicts outcomes in anal cancer managed with chemoradiotherapy, British Journal of Cancer, vol.10, issue.4, pp.498-504, 2011.
DOI : 10.1007/s11307-005-0003-6

B. Fei, H. Wang, C. Wu, and S. Chiu, Choline PET for Monitoring Early Tumor Response to Photodynamic Therapy, Journal of Nuclear Medicine, vol.51, issue.1, pp.130-138, 2010.
DOI : 10.2967/jnumed.109.067579

W. Huang, T. Zhou, L. Ma, H. Sun, H. Gong et al., Standard uptake value and metabolic tumor volume of 18F-FDG PET/CT predict short-term outcome early in the course of chemoradiotherapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, vol.46, issue.Suppl 1, pp.1628-1663, 2011.
DOI : 10.1007/s00259-011-1838-5

W. Weber, 18F-FDG PET in Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma: Qualitative or Quantitative?, Journal of Nuclear Medicine, vol.48, issue.10, pp.1580-1582, 2007.
DOI : 10.2967/jnumed.107.042911

S. M. Bentzen, Theragnostic imaging for radiation oncology: dose-painting by numbers, The Lancet Oncology, vol.6, issue.2, pp.112-117, 2005.
DOI : 10.1016/S1470-2045(05)01737-7

C. Lin, E. Itti, and C. Haioun, Early 18F-FDG PET for Prediction of Prognosis in Patients with Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: SUV-Based Assessment Versus Visual Analysis, Journal of Nuclear Medicine, vol.48, issue.10, pp.1626-1632, 2007.
DOI : 10.2967/jnumed.107.042093

W. Weber, S. Ziegler, R. Thodtmann, A. Hanauske, and M. Schwaiger, Reproducibility of metabolic measurements in malignant tumors using FDG PET, J Nucl Med, vol.40, issue.158, pp.1771-1777159, 1999.

C. Nahmias and L. Wahl, Reproducibility of Standardized Uptake Value Measurements Determined by 18F-FDG PET in Malignant Tumors, Journal of Nuclear Medicine, vol.49, issue.11, pp.1804-1808, 2008.
DOI : 10.2967/jnumed.108.054239

N. C. Krak and R. Boellaard, Effects of ROI definition and reconstruction method on quantitative outcome and applicability in a response monitoring trial, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, vol.26, issue.3, pp.294-301, 2005.
DOI : 10.1007/s00259-004-1566-1

M. Hatt, C. Cheze-le-rest, L. Aboagye, . Kenny, F. Rosso et al., Reproducibility of 18F-FDG and 3'-Deoxy-3'-18F-Fluorothymidine PET Tumor Volume Measurements, Journal of Nuclear Medicine, vol.51, issue.9, pp.1368-1376, 2010.
DOI : 10.2967/jnumed.110.078501

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/inserm-00537774

S. Larson, Y. Erdi, T. Akhurst, M. Mazumdar, H. Macapinlac et al., Tumor Treatment Response Based on Visual and Quantitative Changes in Global Tumor Glycolysis Using PET-FDG Imaging The Visual Response Score and the Change in Total Lesion Glycolysis, Clinical Positron Imaging, vol.2, issue.3, pp.159-171, 1999.
DOI : 10.1016/S1095-0397(99)00016-3

P. Therasse, S. Arbuck, E. Eisenhauer, J. Wanders, R. Kaplan et al., New Guidelines to Evaluate the Response to Treatment in Solid Tumors, JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute, vol.92, issue.3, pp.205-216, 2000.
DOI : 10.1093/jnci/92.3.205

R. Wahl, H. Jacene, Y. Kasamon, and M. Lodge, From RECIST to PERCIST: Evolving Considerations for PET Response Criteria in Solid Tumors, Journal of Nuclear Medicine, vol.50, issue.Suppl_1, pp.122-150, 2009.
DOI : 10.2967/jnumed.108.057307

B. Moffat, Functional diffusion map: A noninvasive MRI biomarker for early stratification of clinical brain tumor response, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol.102, issue.15, pp.102-5524, 2005.
DOI : 10.1073/pnas.0501532102

H. Necib, M. Dusart, P. Tylski, B. Vanderlinden, and I. Buvat, Detection and characterization of the tumor change between two FDG PET scans using parametric imaging, 2008 5th IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro, pp.49121-161, 2008.
DOI : 10.1109/ISBI.2008.4540922

L. Bruzzone and D. Prieto, Automatic analysis of the difference image for unsupervised change detection, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, vol.38, issue.3, pp.381171-1182, 2000.
DOI : 10.1109/36.843009

S. , L. Hégarat-mascle, and R. Seltz, Automatic change detection by evidential fusion of change indices, Remote Sensing of Environment, pp.91-94, 2004.

M. Hatt, C. Cheze-le-rest, A. Turzo, C. Roux, and D. Visvikis, A Fuzzy Locally Adaptive Bayesian Segmentation Approach for Volume Determination in PET, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, vol.28, issue.6, pp.881-893, 2009.
DOI : 10.1109/TMI.2008.2012036

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/inserm-00372910

F. Smarandache and J. Dezert, Advances and applications of DSmT for information fusion : collected works, 2004.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01080187

J. Rajendran, D. Schwartz, and J. O. Sullivan, Tumor Hypoxia Imaging with [F-18] Fluoromisonidazole Positron Emission Tomography in Head and Neck Cancer, Clinical Cancer Research, vol.12, issue.18, pp.5435-5441, 2006.
DOI : 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-05-1773

M. Soret, S. L. Bacharach, and I. Buvat, Partial-Volume Effect in PET Tumor Imaging, Journal of Nuclear Medicine, vol.48, issue.6, pp.932-945, 2007.
DOI : 10.2967/jnumed.106.035774

N. Boussion, C. Cheze-le-rest, M. Hatt, and D. Visvikis, Incorporation of wavelet-based denoising in iterative deconvolution for partial volume correction in whole-body PET imaging, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, vol.17, issue.2, pp.1064-75, 2008.
DOI : 10.1007/s00259-009-1065-5

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/inserm-00537782

A. L. Pogam, P. Descourt, M. Hatt, N. Boussion, and D. Visvikis, A combined 3-D wavelet and curvelet approach for edge preserving denoising in emission tomography, Journal of Nuclear Medicine, vol.50, issue.S2, p.533, 2009.

Z. Ouksili, Accurate PET/PET registration of serial to assess lung tumor evolution, th IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging, pp.732-735, 2007.

G. Mercier and S. Derrode, SAR image change detection using distance between distributions of classes, IEEE International IEEE International IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, 2004. IGARSS '04. Proceedings. 2004, pp.3872-3875, 2004.
DOI : 10.1109/IGARSS.2004.1369969

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00082777

G. Celeux and J. Diebolt, L'algorithme SEM : un algorithme d'apprentissage probabiliste pour la reconnaissance de mélanges de densités, Revue de statistique appliquée, 1986.

A. Bhattacharyya, On a measure of divergence between two statistical populations defined by their probability distributions, Bull. Calcutta Math. Soc, pp.35-99, 1943.

P. Coppin, . Jonckheere, . Nackaerts, E. Muys, and . Lambin, DIGITAL CHANGE DETECTION METHODS IN NATURAL ECOSYSTEM MONITORING: A REVIEW, Analysis of Multi-Temporal Remote Sensing Images, pp.1565-1596, 2004.
DOI : 10.1142/9789812777249_0001

A. Le-maitre, . Segars, . Reilhac, . Hatt, C. Tomei et al., Incorporating Patient-Specific Variability in the Simulation of Realistic Whole-Body <formula formulatype="inline"><tex Notation="TeX">$^{18}{\hbox{F-FDG}}$</tex></formula> Distributions for Oncology Applications, Proceedings of the IEEE, vol.97, issue.12, pp.2026-2038, 2009.
DOI : 10.1109/JPROC.2009.2027925

F. Lamare, Y. Turzo, . Bizais, . Cc-le-rest, and . Visvikis, Validation of a Monte Carlo simulation of the Philips Allegro/GEMINI PET systems using GATE, Physics in Medicine and Biology, vol.51, issue.4, pp.943-62, 2006.
DOI : 10.1088/0031-9155/51/4/013

U. Nestle, . Kremp, C. Schaefer-schuler, . Sebastian-welch, C. Hellwig et al., Comparison of Different Methods for Delineation of 18F-FDG PET-Positive Tissue for Target Volume Definition in Radiotherapy of Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer, Journal of Nuclear Medicine, vol.46, issue.8, pp.1342-1350, 2005.

P. Tylski, . Stute, . Grotu, . Doyeux, . Hapdey et al., Comparative Assessment of Methods for Estimating Tumor Volume and Standardized Uptake Value in 18F-FDG PET, Journal of Nuclear Medicine, vol.51, issue.2, pp.268-276, 2010.
DOI : 10.2967/jnumed.109.066241

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/inserm-00466261

M. Hatt, . Visvikis, . Nm-albarghach, . Tixier, C. Pradier et al., Prognostic value of 18F-FDG PET image-based parameters in oesophageal cancer and impact of tumour delineation methodology, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, vol.51, issue.9, pp.1191-1202, 2011.
DOI : 10.1007/s00259-011-1755-7

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/inserm-00574267

M. Hatt, C. Cheze-le-rest, A. Van-baardwijk, P. Lambin, O. Pradier et al., Impact of Tumor Size and Tracer Uptake Heterogeneity in 18F-FDG PET and CT Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Tumor Delineation, Journal of Nuclear Medicine, vol.52, issue.11, pp.1690-1697, 2011.
DOI : 10.2967/jnumed.111.092767

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00703670

F. Tixier, C. Cheze-le-rest, . Hatt, . Nm-albargach, J. Pradier et al., Intra-tumor heterogeneity characterized by textural features on baseline 18 F-FDG PET images predicts response to concomitant radio-chemotherapy in esophageal cancer, Journal of Nuclear Medicine, issue.3, pp.52369-378, 2011.