Experimental Design for Binary Data, Journal of the American Statistical Association, vol.29, issue.381, pp.90-98, 1983. ,
DOI : 10.1080/01621459.1983.10477936
Efficiency vs Bias of Willingness-to-Pay Estimates: Bivariate and Interval-Data Models, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, vol.29, issue.2, pp.169-180, 1995. ,
DOI : 10.1006/jeem.1995.1039
Optimal Designs for Discrete Choice Contingent Valuation Surveys: Single-Bound, Double-Bound, and Bivariate Models, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, vol.28, issue.3, pp.287-306, 1995. ,
DOI : 10.1006/jeem.1995.1019
Modeling Response Incentive Effects in Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation Data, Land Economics, vol.73, issue.3, pp.309-333, 1997. ,
DOI : 10.2307/3147170
Modeling Starting Point Bias as Unobserved Heterogeneity in Contingent Valuation Surveys: An Application to Air Pollution, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, vol.89, issue.2, pp.533-580, 2007. ,
DOI : 10.1111/j.1467-8276.2006.01020.x
Heterogeneous anchoring and the shift effect in iterative valuation questions, Resource and Energy Economics, vol.30, issue.1, pp.12-20, 2008. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.reseneeco.2007.03.002
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00409676
Report of the NOAA panel on contingent valuation, Technical Report, vol.58, issue.10, pp.1601-1614, 1993. ,
Valuing Outcomes in Health Care, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, vol.51, issue.8, pp.667-76, 1998. ,
DOI : 10.1016/S0895-4356(98)00036-5
On the contingent valuation of safety and the safety of contingent valuation: Part 1-caveat investigator, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, vol.17, issue.1, pp.5-25, 1998. ,
DOI : 10.1023/A:1007711416843
Measuring Values of Extramarket Goods: Are Indirect Measures Biased?, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, vol.61, issue.5, pp.926-930, 1979. ,
DOI : 10.2307/3180348
Hypothetical versus real willingness to pay in the health care sector: results from a field experiment, Journal of Health Economics, vol.20, issue.3, pp.441-57, 2001. ,
DOI : 10.1016/S0167-6296(01)00075-3
Starting Point Bias in Contingent Valuation Bidding Games, Land Economics, vol.61, issue.2, pp.188-194, 1985. ,
DOI : 10.2307/3145811
Anchoring and Adjustment in Single-Bounded, Contingent-Valuation Questions, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, vol.79, issue.5, pp.1495-1500, 1997. ,
DOI : 10.2307/1244370
Bid Design and Yea Saying in Single-Bounded, Dichotomous-Choice Questions, Land Economics, vol.74, issue.1, pp.49-64, 1998. ,
DOI : 10.2307/3147212
Should Patients Have a Greater Role in Valuing Health States?, Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, vol.50, issue.5, pp.201-209, 2005. ,
DOI : 10.2165/00148365-200504040-00002
Referendum Contingent Valuation Estimates: Sensitivity to the Assignment of Offered Values, Journal of the American Statistical Association, vol.1, issue.416, pp.910-918, 1991. ,
DOI : 10.2307/1241429
Estimation Using Contingent Valuation Data from a "Dichotomous Choice with Follow-Up" Questionnaire, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, vol.27, issue.3, pp.218-234, 1994. ,
DOI : 10.1006/jeem.1994.1035
How much are patients willing to pay for an earlier alleviation of influenza?, Options for the control of influenza IV, pp.67-72, 2001. ,
DOI : 10.1016/S0531-5131(01)00327-2
Influenza Burden of Illness, Archives of Internal Medicine, vol.162, issue.16, pp.1842-1850, 2002. ,
DOI : 10.1001/archinte.162.16.1842
Incentive and informational properties of preference questions, Environmental and Resource Economics, vol.51, issue.1, pp.181-210, 2007. ,
DOI : 10.1007/s10640-007-9124-5
On the contingent valuation of safety and the safety of contingent valuation: Part 2-the cv/sg "chained" approach, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, vol.17, issue.3, pp.187-213, 1998. ,
DOI : 10.1023/A:1007782800868
Psychosocial status in chronic illness. a comparative analysis of six diagnostic groups, N England J Med, issue.8, pp.311-506, 1984. ,
The limits of anchoring, Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, vol.95, issue.4, pp.232-274, 1994. ,
DOI : 10.1002/bdm.3960070402
Willingness of families caring for victims of dementia to pay for nursing home care: results of a pilot study in Taiwan, Journal of Management in Medicine, vol.12, issue.6, pp.349-60, 1998. ,
DOI : 10.1108/02689239810234571
Valuing the benefits of mobile mammographic screening units using the contingent valuation method, Applied Economics, vol.23, issue.13, pp.1647-55, 2000. ,
DOI : 10.1016/0095-0696(86)90007-0
Sensitivity of Willingness-to-Pay Estimates to Bid Design in Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation Models, Land Economics, vol.68, issue.2, pp.211-235, 1992. ,
DOI : 10.2307/3146775
Effectiveness of neuraminidase inhibitors in treatment and prevention of influenza A and B: systematic review and meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials, BMJ, vol.326, issue.7401, pp.1235-1276, 2003. ,
DOI : 10.1136/bmj.326.7401.1235
Alternative approaches to obtain optimal bid values in contingent valuation studies and to model protest zeros. Estimating the determinants of individuals' willingness to pay for home care services in day case surgery, Health Economics, vol.5, issue.2, pp.101-119, 2001. ,
DOI : 10.1002/hec.583
The impact of considering adaptation in health state valuation, Social Science & Medicine, vol.61, issue.2, pp.267-277, 2005. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.11.060
Health State Valuation in Mild to Moderate Cognitive Impairment: Feasibility of Computer-Based, Direct Patient Utility Assessment, Medical Decision Making, vol.28, issue.2, pp.220-252, 2008. ,
DOI : 10.1177/0272989X07311750
Whose Preferences Count?, Medical Decision Making, vol.311, issue.4, pp.482-488, 1999. ,
DOI : 10.1177/0272989X9901900416
Heterogeneous anchoring in dichotomous choice valuation framework, Recherches ??conomiques de Louvain, vol.73, issue.4, pp.369-384, 2007. ,
DOI : 10.3917/rel.734.0369
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00176056
The use of a canonical form in the construction of locally optimal designs for non-linear problems, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, vol.54, issue.2, pp.569-583, 1992. ,
Starting Point Bias in Dichotomous Choice Valuation with Follow-Up Questioning, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, vol.30, issue.1, pp.112-131, 1996. ,
DOI : 10.1006/jeem.1996.0008
Dynamic Learning and Context-Dependence in Sequential, Attribute-Based, Stated-Preference Valuation Questions, Land Economics, vol.81, issue.1, pp.114-126, 2005. ,
DOI : 10.3368/le.81.1.114
The economics of safety and physical risk, 1989. ,
Altruism and the value of other people's safety, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, vol.7, issue.2, pp.213-219, 1992. ,
DOI : 10.1007/BF00056126
Paternalistic Altruism and the Value of Statistical Life, The Economic Journal, vol.102, issue.410, pp.80-90, 1992. ,
DOI : 10.2307/2234853
Essays on methodologies in contingent valuation and the sustainable management of common pool resources, 2006. ,
Bias in Discrete Response Contingent Valuation, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, vol.28, issue.1, pp.114-139, 1995. ,
DOI : 10.1006/jeem.1995.1008
Design of Sequential Experiments for Contingent Valuation Studies, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, vol.25, issue.1, pp.1-11, 1995. ,
DOI : 10.1006/jeem.1993.1029
Revealed preference valuation compared to contingent valuation: radon-induced lung cancer prevention, Health Economics, vol.73, issue.7, pp.585-98, 2002. ,
DOI : 10.1002/hec.724
Differences in Health Values Among Patients, Family Members, and Providers for Outcomes in Schizophrenia, Medical Care, vol.38, issue.10, pp.1011-1032, 2000. ,
DOI : 10.1097/00005650-200010000-00005
On hypothetical bias and calibration in cost???benefit studies, Health Policy, vol.52, issue.1, pp.53-70, 2000. ,
DOI : 10.1016/S0168-8510(00)00067-1
Mother's willingness to pay for her own and her child's health: a contingent valuation study in Taiwan, Health Economics, vol.22, issue.4, pp.319-345, 2000. ,
DOI : 10.1002/1099-1050(200006)9:4<319::AID-HEC521>3.0.CO;2-3
Willingness-to-Pay Estimates Using the Double-Bounded Dichotomous-Choice Contingent Valuation Format: A Test for Validity and Precision in a Bayesian Framework, Land Economics, vol.75, issue.1, pp.115-125, 1999. ,
DOI : 10.2307/3146996
Optimal Designs for Binary Data, Journal of the American Statistical Association, vol.70, issue.400, pp.1098-1103, 1987. ,
DOI : 10.1080/01621459.1987.10478545
Using willingness to pay to measure family members' preferences in mental health, J Ment Health Policy Econ, vol.8, pp.71-81, 2005. ,
Comparison processes in social judgment: Mechanisms and consequences., Psychological Review, vol.110, issue.3, pp.472-89, 2003. ,
DOI : 10.1037/0033-295X.110.3.472
Optimal Designs of Discrete Response Experiments in Contingent Valuation Studies, The Review of Economics and Statistics, vol.74, issue.3, pp.559-563, 1992. ,
DOI : 10.2307/2109503
Theory versuspractice: a review of ?willingness-to-pay? in health and health care, Health Economics, vol.6, issue.1, pp.39-52, 2001. ,
DOI : 10.1002/1099-1050(200101)10:1<39::AID-HEC563>3.0.CO;2-E
Hypothetical and actual willingness to pay for insecticide-treated nets in five Nigerian communities, Tropical Medicine and International Health, vol.11, issue.7, pp.545-53, 2001. ,
DOI : 10.1016/0277-9536(96)00015-9
Willingness-to-pay for pediatric cochlear implantation, International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, vol.68, issue.1, pp.91-100, 2004. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.ijporl.2003.09.009
Efficiency Gains Afforded by Improved Bid Design versus Follow-up Valuation Questions in Discrete-Choice CV Studies, Land Economics, vol.76, issue.2, pp.299-311, 2000. ,
DOI : 10.2307/3147230
Review of economic evaluations of neuraminidase inhibitors to control influenza, Expert Rev Pharmacoeconomics Res, vol.3, pp.89-101, 2003. ,
Robust Designs for Binary Data, Biometrics, vol.48, issue.4, pp.1145-1155, 1992. ,
DOI : 10.2307/2532705
Willingness to pay in arthritis: a Danish contribution, Rheumatology, vol.39, issue.7, pp.791-800, 2000. ,
DOI : 10.1093/rheumatology/39.7.791
Effect of influenza B virus infection on human performance., BMJ, vol.306, issue.6880, pp.760-761, 1993. ,
DOI : 10.1136/bmj.306.6880.760
The Discrete-choice Willingness-to-pay Question Format in Health Economics:, Medical Decision Making, vol.70, issue.4, pp.194-206, 2000. ,
DOI : 10.1017/CBO9780511809477
Construction of the contingent valuation market in health care:a critical assessment, Health Economics, vol.59, issue.8, pp.609-637, 2003. ,
DOI : 10.1002/hec.755
The Use of Significant Others as Proxy Raters of the Quality of Life of Patients with Brain Cancer, Medical Care, vol.35, issue.5, pp.490-506, 1997. ,
DOI : 10.1097/00005650-199705000-00006
Measuring Patient Preferences by Willingness to Pay to Avoid: The Case of Acute Otitis Media, Medical Decision Making, vol.19, issue.1, pp.27-37, 1999. ,
DOI : 10.1177/0272989X9901900104
Proxy Reporting of Quality of Life Using the EQ-5D, Medical Care, vol.40, issue.12, pp.1186-95, 2002. ,
DOI : 10.1097/00005650-200212000-00006
Bias in proxies' reports of disability: data from the national health interview survey on disability, Am J Public Health, vol.90, pp.1248-1253, 2000. ,
Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases, Science, vol.185, issue.4157, pp.1124-1155, 1974. ,
DOI : 10.1126/science.185.4157.1124
Exploring preference anomalies in double bounded contingent valuation, Journal of Health Economics, vol.26, issue.3, pp.463-482, 2007. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2006.10.009
Incentive Incompatibility and Starting-Point Bias in Iterative Valuation Questions, Land Economics, vol.78, issue.2, pp.285-297, 2002. ,
DOI : 10.2307/3147274
Specification Error in Probit Models, The Review of Economics and Statistics, vol.67, issue.1, pp.134-173, 1984. ,
DOI : 10.2307/1928444