s'authentifier
version française rss feed
Ethical issues in instructions to authors of journals in oral-craniomaxillofacial/facial plastic surgery and related specialties.
Pitak-Arnnop P., Bauer U., Dhanuthai K., Brückner M., Hervé C., Meningaud J.-P., Hemprich A.
Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery 38, 8 (2010) 554-9 - http://www.hal.inserm.fr/inserm-00612303
(20304661)
Ethical issues in instructions to authors of journals in oral-craniomaxillofacial/facial plastic surgery and related specialties.
Poramate Pitak-Arnnop1, 2, Ute Bauer1, Kittipong Dhanuthai3, Martin Brückner1, Christian Hervé2, Jean-Paul Meningaud2, 4, Alexander Hemprich1
1 :  Department of Oral, Craniomaxillofacial and Facial Plastic Surgery
University Hospital of Leipzig
Faculty of Medicine, Leipzig
Allemagne
2 :  LEM - Laboratoire d'éthique médicale et médecine légale
Université Paris V - Paris Descartes
Faculté de médecine, 45 rue des Saints-Pères, Paris 75006
France
3 :  Department of Oral Pathology
Chulalongkorn University
Faculty of Dentistry, Bangkok
Thaïlande
4 :  Service de chirurgie plastique et reconstructive [Mondor]
Assistance publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP) – Hôpital Henri Mondor – Université Paris-Est Créteil Val-de-Marne (UPEC)
51 Av Maréchal de Lattre de Tassigny, 94000 Créteil
France
BACKGROUND: Ethical standards of biomedical publications are associated with editorial leadership, such as contents of instructions to authors and journal's mechanisms for research and publication ethics. OBJECTIVES: To compare ethical issues in the guidelines for authors in oral-craniomaxillofacial/facial plastic surgery (OCM-FPS) journals with those in plastic surgery and otorhinolaryngology/head and neck surgery (ORL-HNS) journals, and to evaluate the relationship between journal's impact factor (IF) and ethical issues in the instructions to authors. METHODS: This study used a cross-sectional study design. The predictor variables were journal's specialty and IF. The outcome variable was the presence of seven ethical issues in the online versions of journal's instructions to authors in October 2009. We included only journals with identifiable IF for 2008, published in English, French, German and Thai. Appropriate descriptive and univariate statistics were computed for all study variables. The level of statistical significance was set at P<0.05. RESULTS: The sample was composed of 48 journals: seven OCM-FPS (14.6%), 14 plastic surgery (29.2%) and 27 ORL-HNS (56.2%) journals. Only four journals (8.3%) mentioned all ethical issues in their guidelines for authors. Neither journal's specialty nor IF was linked to completeness of the ethical requirements. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggest that ethical issues in the instructions to authors of most IF-indexed journals in OCM-FPS, plastic surgery and ORL-HNS are incomplete, regardless of specialty and IF. There is room for substantial improvement to uphold scientific integrity of these surgical specialties.
Sciences du Vivant/Ethique
Anglais
1878-4119

Articles dans des revues avec comité de lecture
10.1016/j.jcms.2010.02.012
Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery (J Craniomaxillofac Surg)
Publisher Elsevier
ISSN 1010-5182 
internationale
12/2010
20/03/2010
38
8
554-9

Authorship – Cross-Sectional Studies – Dental Research – Editorial Policies – Ethics – Research – Guidelines as Topic – Journal Impact Factor – Journalism – Dental – Periodicals as Topic – Specialties – Surgical – Surgery – Oral – Plastic

tous les articles de la base du CCSd...