s'authentifier
version française rss feed
Mortality meetings: ethical considerations and adherence to evidence-based practice from 6 years of experience in a mixed cardiac department.
Larrazet F., Folliguet T., Laborde F., Bachet J., Hervé C.
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 40, 5 (2011) 1039-45 - http://www.hal.inserm.fr/inserm-00612100
(21450483)
Mortality meetings: ethical considerations and adherence to evidence-based practice from 6 years of experience in a mixed cardiac department.
Fabrice Larrazet1, 2, Thierry Folliguet3, François Laborde3, Jean Bachet4, Christian Hervé2
1 :  Cardiologie et unité de soins intensifs cardiologiques
Hôpital Saint Camille
2 rue des Pères Camilliens, 94366 Bry sur Marne
France
2 :  LEM - Laboratoire d'éthique médicale et médecine légale
Université Paris V - Paris Descartes
Faculté de médecine, 45 rue des Saints-Pères, Paris 75006
France
3 :  Pathologie cardiaque
Institut mutualiste Montsouris
Paris
France
4 :  Zayed Military Hospital
Zayed Military Hospital
Abu Dhabi
Émirats Arabes Unis
Objective: Most patients die unexpectedly in cardiac departments. We analyzed the ethical issues raised by poor outcomes and the leading causes of hospital deaths including organic causes of deaths, system failures, and questionable caregivers' attitudes. Method: We analyzed reports from 99 mortality conferences in a mixed cardiac department (surgery and interventional cardiology) where 146 patients died from 2002 to 2008. Results: Patients were referred for cardiac surgery (n=115), interventional cardiology (n=25), or medical therapy (n=11). Highly recommended class I interventions were performed in most patients (n=120, 82%). A history of renal failure (25%), peripheral artery disease (21%), diabetes (18%), cancer (16%), or respiratory disease (16%) was frequently noticed. The areas most frequently identified as potentially problematic were preoperative strategy (58%), surgical technique (50%), monitoring (47%), reactivity (43%), drug prescription (32%), difficulties or delays in diagnosis (27%), and transfer (21%). At least one transgression from routine medical practice was identified in 66 (45%) patients, and a causal relationship between this transgression and the patient's death was suggested in 33 cases (23%). Serious errors were identified for five patients (3%), with a suggested causal relationship to death in two cases. Ethical discussions focused on alternatives in treatment (73%), good medical practice (44%), secondary recommendations (18%), information (12%), consent (12%), non-malfeasance (7%), and equity (6%). Conclusions: Mortality conferences provide an opportunity to identify many system failures. Poor outcome is multifactorial. Technical and ethical aspects should be considered for quality care improvement.
Sciences du Vivant/Ethique
Sciences du Vivant/Médecine humaine et pathologie/Cardiologie et système cardiovasculaire
Anglais
1873-734X

Articles dans des revues avec comité de lecture
10.1016/j.ejcts.2011.02.050
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg
internationale
11/2011
29/03/2011
40
5
1039-45

Mortality – Ethics – Errors – Cardiacsurgery – Valvesurgery

tous les articles de la base du CCSd...