Quality versus quantity: assessing individual research performance.

Abstract : Evaluating individual research performance is a complex task that ideally examines productivity, scientific impact, and research quality-a task that metrics alone have been unable to achieve. In January 2011, the French Academy of Sciences published a report on current bibliometric (citation metric) methods for evaluating individual researchers, as well as recommendations for the integration of quality assessment. Here, I draw on key issues raised by this report and comment on the suggestions for improving existing research evaluation practices.
Type de document :
Article dans une revue
Science Translational Medicine, American Association for the Advancement of Science, 2011, 3 (84), pp.84cm13. 〈10.1126/scitranslmed.3002249〉
Liste complète des métadonnées

http://www.hal.inserm.fr/inserm-00608624
Contributeur : Katia Marazova <>
Soumis le : mercredi 13 juillet 2011 - 15:46:07
Dernière modification le : jeudi 11 janvier 2018 - 06:22:24
Document(s) archivé(s) le : vendredi 14 octobre 2011 - 02:41:30

Fichiers

inserm-00608624_edited.pdf
Fichiers produits par l'(les) auteur(s)

Identifiants

Collections

Citation

José-Alain Sahel. Quality versus quantity: assessing individual research performance.. Science Translational Medicine, American Association for the Advancement of Science, 2011, 3 (84), pp.84cm13. 〈10.1126/scitranslmed.3002249〉. 〈inserm-00608624〉

Partager

Métriques

Consultations de la notice

150

Téléchargements de fichiers

649