1471-2458-10-74 1471-2458 Research article <p>Determinants of smoking initiation among women in five European countries: a cross-sectional survey</p> Oh L Debora deboraoh@usc.edu Heck E Julia jeheck@ucla.edu Dresler Carolyn Carolyn.Dresler@arkansas.gov Allwright Shane sllwright@tdc.ie Haglund Margaretha margaretha.haglund@fhi.se Del Mazo S Sara sara.sanchez@ki.se Kralikova Eva eva.kralikova@lf1.cuni.cz Stucker Isabelle stucker@vjf.inserm.fr Tamang Elizabeth etamang@ulss15.pd.it Gritz R Ellen egritz@mdanderson.org Hashibe Mia mia.hashibe@utah.edu

International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France

Department of Epidemiology, University of California Los Angeles, School of Public Health, Los Angeles, California, USA

Tobacco Prevention and Cessation Program, Arkansas Department of Health, Little Rock, Arkansas, USA

Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Trinity College Dublin, Republic of Ireland

Tobacco Control, National Institute of Public Health, Östersund, Sweden

Health Professionals Against Tobacco, Stockholm, Sweden

Institute of Hygiene and Epidemiology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic

3rd Medical Department - Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic

INSERM U 754 - IFR69, Villejuif, France

Regione del Veneto - Direzione Prevenzione, Servizio di Sanità Pubblica e Screening, Venezia, Italy

Department of Behavioral Science, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA

Division of Public Health, Department of Family & Preventive Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA

BMC Public Health 1471-2458 2010 10 1 74 http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/10/74 10.1186/1471-2458-10-74 20163736
12 10 2009 17 2 2010 17 2 2010 2010 Oh et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Background

The rate of smoking and lung cancer among women is rising in Europe. The primary aim of this study was to determine why women begin smoking in five different European countries at different stages of the tobacco epidemic and to determine if smoking is associated with certain characteristics and/or beliefs about smoking.

Methods

A cross-sectional telephone survey on knowledge and beliefs about tobacco was conducted as part of the Women in Europe Against Lung Cancer and Smoking (WELAS) Project. A total of 5 000 adult women from France, Ireland, Italy, Czech Republic, and Sweden were interviewed, with 1 000 from each participating country. All participants were asked questions about demographics, knowledge and beliefs about smoking, and their tobacco use background. Current and former smokers also were asked questions about smoking initiation. Basic statistics on the cross-sectional data was reported with chi-squared and ANOVA p-values. Logistic regression was used to analyze ever versus never smokers. Linear regression analyses were used to analyze age of smoking initiation.

Results

Being older, being divorced, having friends/family who smoke, and having parents who smoke were all significantly associated with ever smoking, though the strength of the associations varied by country. The most frequently reported reason for initiation smoking was friend smoking, with 62.3% of ever smokers reporting friends as one of the reasons why they began smoking. Mean age of smoking initiation was 18.2 years and over 80% of participants started smoking by the age of 20. The highest levels of young initiators were in Sweden with 29.3% of women initiating smoking at age 14-15 and 12.0% initiating smoking younger than age 14. The lowest level of young initiators was in the Czech Republic with 13.7% of women initiating smoking at age 14-15 and 1.4% of women initiating smoking younger than age 14. Women who started smoking because their friends smoked or to look 'cool' were more likely to start smoking at a younger age. Women who started smoking to manage stress or to feel less depressed were more likely to start smoking at an older age.

Conclusions

In all five participating countries, friends were the primary factor influencing ever smoking, especially among younger women. The majority of participants began smoking in adolescence and the average reported age of smoking initiation was youngest in Sweden and oldest in the Czech Republic.

Background

The prevalence of smoking among women varies greatly across European countries, ranging from less than 10% to over 30% 1. Overall, however, Europe has some of the highest levels of female smoking in the world 2. Furthermore, while smoking among men has declined in some European countries, it is still increasing or stabilised among women in most European countries 345.

Reasons for smoking initiation differ across cultures but certain factors have an established association with smoking. Parental, sibling, and friend smoking all have been shown to be strongly associated with an individual's smoking status 678910111213. Low academic achievement as well as low socioeconomic status are also associated with smoking status 812141516. Women, just like men, begin to smoke in increasing proportions in the population because of marketing 17 and the tobacco industry significantly targets women with focused advertisements and promotions 18. Women appear to have different reasons for smoking than men; for example, tension reduction and stimulation are thought to be more strongly associated with women smoking than with men 1920. There is also evidence that weight concerns play a role in the decision to smoke among women 21222324.

Over 60% of lung cancer cases in European women are attributed to their smoking history 2526. Thus with smoking rates in women rising, it is not surprising that lung cancer rates in women have also increased in most European countries 2728. In order to prevent further increases in smoking-related mortality, it is important that anti-tobacco measures target women in Europe.

Many European countries have recently made substantial changes in policy toward smoking and tobacco. The European Community as an entity, in addition to all major European Region countries, except the Czech Republic, has ratified the World Health Organization's Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC). The FCTC became international law in 2004 and is a comprehensive tobacco control treaty which includes an article for 100% smoke-free policies. In the same year, Ireland implemented a nation-wide ban on smoking in bars and restaurants. Since then, other European countries, including France, Italy and Sweden, have followed with similar national smoke-free legislation. Other measures against tobacco include increasing taxes on tobacco, improving consumer information, health warning labels on tobacco products, banning tobacco advertising promotion and sponsorship, and facilitating access to smoking cessation treatment 29.

The objective of this study is to determine if ever smoking and smoking initiation are associated with certain characteristics or beliefs about smoking in women in five European countries. In particular, this study aims to elucidate if these characteristics or beliefs about smoking are different for women in countries at different stages in the tobacco epidemic, with northern European countries generally being at a more advanced stage of the epidemic than southern European countries. As current policies are being rapidly reformed in Europe, and as rates of smoking are rising among European women, understanding reasons why European women smoke is crucial in guiding future tobacco control measures.

Methods

Participants

As part of the Women in Europe Against Lung Cancer and Smoking (WELAS) Project, supported by the European Commission, a cross-sectional land-line telephone survey on health attitudes and knowledge was conducted from June to July 2008 in five European countries: France, Ireland, Italy, Czech Republic, and Sweden 30. These countries were chosen because they are at different stages of the tobacco epidemic and at different stages of enacting tobacco control measures. This study was approved by the International Agency for Research on Cancer ethical review committee.

In total, 5 000 women participated in this survey, with 1 000 women from each participating country. Of the women reached who were eligible for participation, response rates were 64.8% in France, 41.4% in Italy, 59.0% in Sweden, 54.6% in Ireland, and 30.6% in the Czech Republic.

Sampling

The goal was to have a sample of women from each country that was nationally representative with regard to age and smoking status. Our sampling frame included all adult women 18 years of age and older who had a listed telephone number in the five participating countries. When a household was reached, the woman interviewed was selected at random from all adult women living in that household. To ensure adequate power to examine subsamples of smokers and nonsmokers for each question, smokers were oversampled to reach 28% of subjects; weighting was done in the analyses to make results representative of each country's female population.

Measures

The survey was identical across countries, with attention given to translation issues. Surveys were translated by native speakers from each participating country and translations were checked by another native speaker in each country. All participants were asked questions about demographics, beliefs about smoking, and tobacco use background in the language native to each country. Current and former smokers were also asked questions about starting smoking.

Our primary outcomes of interest were 1) ever smoking and 2) age at smoking initiation. Women who reported smoking "every day", "some days or occasionally", or "not anymore (>100 cigarettes in life)", were combined to create a group of "ever smokers". Participants with a smoking history were asked at what age they first started smoking regularly.

Background characteristics with prior associations with smoking initiation were included in the analyses, such as age, education, marital status, and income. Since educational systems differ across countries, we measured education as the age at last year of education. Age at last year of education was categorized into less than 16, 16 to 19, 20 to 25, and over 26 years old. These categories were meant to approximately reflect those who did not finish secondary school, those who finished secondary school, those who went to university, and those who had post-graduate education. Respondents reporting being divorced and separated were combined into one category for analysis. In order to create comparable categories between countries, information on personal household income was collected relative to the national median household disposable income for 2005-6 for their respective country. For example, the actual question asked in Ireland was "Given that the median annual household income in Ireland is approximately 43 000 euro, would you say that your household income is well below, below, around, above or well above the median?" The national medians provided to respondents were: 30 000 euro for France (2005; source INSEE), 230 000 krona for Sweden (2006; source Statistiska centralbyran), 32 000 euro for Italy (2006; source Bank of Italy), 110 000 koruna for the Czech Republic (2006; source Czech Statistical Office), 43 000 euro for Ireland (2006; source Central Statistics Office Ireland).

Information on friends and family smoking was also collected for the analysis. Those who reported that "more than half" or "most or all" of their friends and family smoked were combined into one category for analyses. Women were also asked if any of their parents, step-parents, or guardians smoked.

Using an open-ended question format, ever smokers were asked to list reasons why they started smoking. Answers were recorded as the participant responded and participants could list more than one reason.

Analyses

All analyses were done with SAS version 9. Chi-squared tests were conducted to test differences between countries. Logistic regression analyses were conducted to determine factors associated with ever smoking and young smoking initiation. Mean age at initiation was compared across country, age, income category, and education. When comparing age cohorts, those who initiated after the age of 24 (~10%) were excluded to remove age-related bias. One-way ANOVA tests were used to test differences in means. Linear regression was conducted to determine if any reasons for smoking initiation were associated with younger age at initiation.

Results

A total of 5 000 women were interviewed for this study, including 1 000 women from each of the five countries. Demographic characteristics are listed in Table 1. Over 40% of participants (n = 2378) had ever smoked (>100 cigarettes in lifetime). Age ranged from 18 to 95 with approximately 37% of participants over the age of 55 (Table 1).

<p>Table 1</p>

Women in Europe Against Lung Cancer and Smoking (WELAS) Project demographics by country, weighted.

All

France

Ireland

Italy

Czech Republic

Sweden

χ2

(n = 5000)

(n = 1000)

(n = 1000)

(n = 1000)

(n = 1000)

(n = 1000)

p-value

n

%

%

%

%

%

%

(df = 4)


Ever smoker

(>100 cigarettes in life)

2622

41.3

37.7

49.0

39.7

34.3

45.8

<0.0001

Current smoker

1421

20.5

19.9

23.5

17.5

19.2

18.6

0.0094


Age

18-24

426

8.5

8.2

11.4

6.5

8.3

8.2

<0.0001

25-34

939

18.8

17.2

22.0

19.4

20.1

15.2

35-44

916

18.3

18.6

19.8

19.0

16.0

18.2

45-54

883

17.7

18.1

16.8

16.9

17.9

18.6

55+

1836

36.7

37.9

30.0

38.2

37.7

39.8

Age at last education

<16

601

12.5

5.0

13.2

25.2

6.0

12.3

<0.0001

16-19

2066

42.6

37.1

52.3

34.4

49.8

39.3

20-25

1683

35.0

53.7

29.2

30.0

35.4

27.8

>25

476

9.7

4.0

5.3

10.4

8.9

20.6

(missing)

(n = 174)

(n = 86)

(n = 27)

(n = 5)

(n = 13)

(n = 43)

Marital Status

Married

1979

41.1

46.3

37.1

52.1

38.0

31.9

<0.0001

Divorced/Separated

727

14.2

20.5

8.2

7.8

16.9

17.5

Widowed

605

12.8

3.5

18.2

11.6

22.1

8.9

Never married

1074

21.6

11.2

33.0

25.4

21.6

16.6

Unmarried couple

514

10.4

18.5

3.6

3.1

1.4

25.1

(missing)

(n = 101)

(n = 38)

(n = 28)

(n = 5)

(n = 22)

(n = 8)

Income

Well below the median

463

9.2

7.5

7.7

17.5

8.2

5.2

<0.0001

Below the median

1183

23.5

24.1

25.3

29.7

19.2

19.2

Around the median

1386

27.6

27.4

26.5

21.6

40.8

21.7

Above the median

805

16.0

14.9

21.9

7.4

14.5

21.2

Well above the median

165

3.3

2.8

3.5

0.5

0.8

9.1

Refused to answer

998

20.4

23.3

15.1

23.31

16.5

23.6

Friends/family smoke

None

991

21.1

18.4

20.1

20.2

16.7

29.9

<0.0001

Few

2304

47.8

42.5

52.2

44.5

45.9

53.7

Less than half

587

11.3

13.6

10.3

10.5

13.3

8.5

About half or more

1094

19.9

25.5

17.4

24.8

24.1

8.0

(missing)

(n = 24)

(n = 1)

(n = 7)

(n = 9)

(n = 4)

(n = 3)

Parents smoke

No

2101

43.1

41.4

36.2

43.2

50.9

43.8

<0.0001

Yes

2899

56.9

58.6

63.8

56.9

49.1

56.2

Older age was significantly associated with ever smoking (Table 2). In particular, older women in Italy, the Czech Republic and Sweden all showed a significant increasing trend of a smoking history. Education and income measures were not significantly associated with smoking. In the combined analysis and in country-specific analyses for Ireland, Italy and Sweden, divorce or separation was significantly associated with ever smoking. In the Czech Republic, being widowed was significantly associated with not smoking, as compared to married women (Table 2). The widowed Czech women tended to be older, less educated and have a lower income (data not shown).

<p>Table 2</p>

Factors associated with ever smokers compared to never smokers by country, weighted.

All

(n = 5000)

France

(n = 1000)

Ireland

(n = 1000)

Italy

(n = 1000)

Czech Republic

(n = 1000)

Sweden

(n = 1000)


OR (95% CI)

OR (95% CI)

OR (95% CI)

OR (95% CI)

OR (95% CI)

OR (95% CI)


Age

18-24

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

25-34

1.43 (1.10, 1.86)

2.02 (1.08,3.78)

1.66 (1.01, 2.75)

1.44 (0.73, 2.83)

0.82 (0.44, 1.55)

1.56 (0.81, 3.01)

35-44

1.58 (1.20, 2.08)

1.33 (0.71, 2.49)

1.81 (1.04, 3.15)

1.82 (0.90, 3.67)

1.11 (0.54, 2.29)

2.50 (1.29, 4.83)

45-54

1.77 (1.33, 2.34)

1.53 (0.83, 2.92)

1.70 (0.95, 3.05)

2.66 (1.30, 5.45)

1.37 (0.66, 2.86)

2.57 (1.33, 4.94)

55+

1.68 (1.28, 2.20)

1.53 (0.83, 2.79)

1.69 (0.94, 3.04)

1.98 (0.99, 3.93)

1.67 (0.81, 3.46)

2.61 (1.37, 4.96)

Age at last education

<16

0.98 (0.75, 1.26)

0.56 (0.25, 1.26)

1.16 (0.57, 2.37)

0.89 (0.52, 1.52)

0.86 (0.39, 1.90)

0.96 (0.59, 1.55)

16-19

1.09 (0.88, 1.36)

0.63 (0.30, 1.33)

1.00 (0.54, 1.87)

1.13 (0.69, 1.83)

1.23 (0.72, 2.08)

1.34 (0.92, 1.96)

20-25

0.85 (0.68, 1.07)

0.55 (0.26, 1.13)

0.66 (0.35, 1.25)

0.96 (0.59, 1.57)

0.91 (0.52, 1.58)

0.83 (0.56, 1.24)

>25

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

Marital status

Married

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

Divorced/Separated

1.49 (1.23, 1.80)

1.16 (0.79, 1.67)

1.91 (1.12, 3.25)

2.00 (1.20, 3.35)

1.42 (0.94, 2.16)

1.73 (1.14, 2.63)

Widowed

0.83 (0.67, 1.04)

1.44 (0.67, 3.10)

0.77 (0.49, 1.20)

0.89 (0.54, 1.46)

0.53 (0.33, 0.84)

1.36 (0.79, 2.36)

Never married

1.13 (0.94, 1.35)

1.86 (1.14, 3.03)

1.28 (0.90, 1.85)

0.97 (0.66, 1.41)

1.21 (0.75, 1.94)

0.89 (0.56, 1.39)

Unmarried couple

1.26 (1.01, 1.58)

1.22 (0.82, 1.82)

1.85 (0.85, 4.02)

1.66 (0.76, 3.60)

1.64 (0.48, 5.59)

1.20 (0.83, 1.73)

Income

Well below the median

1.27 (1.00, 1.61)

1.57 (0.90, 2.74)

1.45 (0.83, 2.54)

1.11 (0.71, 1.75)

0.73 (0.40, 1.34)

1.87 (0.93, 3.75)

Below the median

Around the median

1.12 (0.94, 1.33)

1.00

1.17 (0.79, 1.74)

1.00

1.16 (0.80, 1.69)

1.00

0.98 (0.67, 1.43)

1.00

1.23 (0.81, 1.86)

1.00

1.03 (0.67, 1.59)

1.00

Above the median

1.17 (0.97, 1.41)

1.61 (1.05, 2.49)

1.03 (0.69, 1.53)

1.00 (0.57, 1.76)

1.16 (0.76, 1.79)

1.13 (0.75, 1.72)

Well above the median

0.97 (0.68, 1.36)

0.85 (0.36, 2.01)

0.47 (0.21, 1.04)

2.13 (0.23, 20.14)

2.14 (0.42, 10.79)

1.42 (0.84, 2.43)

Refused to answer

0.87 (0.72, 1.04)

1.14 (0.75, 1.74)

0.88 (0.57, 1.35)

0.56 (0.37, 0.85)

0.81 (0.52, 1.25)

0.90 (0.60, 1.34)

Friends/family smoke

None

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

Few

1.45 (1.23, 1.71)

1.34 (0.89, 2.02)

1.73 (1.20, 2.50)

0.97 (0.67, 1.41)

3.09 (1.79, 5.33)

1.49 (1.09, 2.04)

Less than half

2.35 (1.87, 2.95)

1.66 (1.00, 2.76)

2.25 (1.33, 3.81)

1.25 (0.74, 2.09)

8.40 (4.48, 15.74)

2.69 (1.58, 4.56)

About half or more

3.97 (3.22, 4.88)

2.57 (1.64, 4.02)

4.03 (2.46, 6.63)

3.17 (2.08, 4.85)

8.26 (4.58, 14.89)

12.37 (5.99, 25.55)

Parents smoke

No

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

Yes

1.67 (1.47, 1.89)

2.21 (1.65, 2.96)

1.40 (1.05, 1.87)

1.28 (0.97, 1.68)

2.21 (1.65, 2.96)

1.54 (1.16, 2.04)

Odds ratios (ever smoker: never smoker) adjusted for all above listed variables (and country for the combined analysis).

Having increasingly more friends and family who smoke was strongly associated with being more likely to smoke. This trend was significant overall and in each country-specific analysis. The associations were especially strong in the Czech Republic and in Sweden. Parent smoking was also significantly associated with ever smoking (Table 2).

In all countries, the primary reason women reported for starting to smoke was because their friends smoked (62.3%). The second most frequent reason reported was to make them look 'more cool' (25.5%). Only 6.1% of participants reported starting smoking because a family member smoked (Table 3). Some common responses listed under 'Other' were curiosity, rebellion, because other people were smoking, or because they had personal problems.

<p>Table 3</p>

Reasons reported for smoking initiation among ever smokers, weighted.*

All

(n = 2378)

%

France

(n = 467)

%

Ireland

(n = 519)

%

Italy

(n = 474)

%

Czech Republic

(n = 429)

%

Sweden

(n = 489)

%

χ2

p-value


My friends smoked

62.3

67.7

65.4

58.6

61.3

58.3

0.0152

Smoking made me look more cool

25.5

14.2

35.4

19.4

28.1

27.6

<0.0001

My friends approved of my smoking

6.9

5.5

16.3

0.9

10.3

0.6

<0.0001

It helped me manage my stress

6.8

8.9

8.1

7.2

7.6

2.6

0.0021

My family members smoked

6.1

6.1

11.1

6.4

4.6

1.7

<0.0001

I was not worried about health effects

5.9

0.4

21.1

0.2

0.9

3.0

<0.0001

I believed I could quit whenever I wanted to

5.6

0.7

18.2

0.2

4.1

1.8

<0.0001

Tobacco advertising was attractive to me

1.7

1.4

4.6

0.1

0.4

1.0

<0.0001

Weight concerns

1.5

1.0

5.0

0.4

0.4

0.2

<0.0001

I was less depressed when I smoked

1.5

1.5

1.7

2.4

1.1

0.8

0.4108

My parents did not mind that I smoked

0.6

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.5

1.1

0.7187

Other

15.6

11.4

14.5

24.5

13.3

14.2

<0.0001

*Participants were allowed to list more than one reason for smoking initiation.

Average age at smoking initiation was 18.2 and ranged from 10 to 60 years old. Average age at smoking initiation was 17.1 in Sweden, 17.9 in Ireland, 18.1 in France, 18.6 in Italy, and 19.6 in the Czech Republic. Over 80% of women smokers had started smoking by the age of 20. Sweden had the highest percentage of women who started smoking at a very young age with 29.3% starting between 14 and 15 years of age and 12.0% starting before the age of 14. The Czech Republic had the lowest percentage of young initiators with 13.7% starting between the ages of 14 and 15 and 1.4% starting younger than 14 years old. The highest percentage of women began smoking between the ages of 16 and 17 in all countries, except Sweden (Table 4).

<p>Table 4</p>

Distribution of age at smoking initiation by country, weighted.

All

France

Ireland

Italy

Czech Republic

Sweden

(n = 2364)

(n = 461)

(n = 515)

(n = 472)

(n = 427)

(n = 489)


Mean age at initiation

18.2

18.1

17.9

18.6

19.6

17.1

(ANOVA p-value < 0.01)


Range and quartile distribution of age at initiation

Maximum

60

50

50

55

60

45

75% quartile

20

19

20

20

20

18

Median

17

17

17

18

18

16

25% quartile

15

16

15

15

16

14

Minimum

10

11

10

12

10

11


Age at initiation

<14

6.8%

3.2%

9.0%

6.0%

1.4%

12.0%

14-15

20.7%

18.1%

20.2%

19.7%

13.7%

29.3%

16-17

24.7%

29.6%

23.2%

22.6%

25.9%

23.4%

18-19

20.4%

24.7%

21.5%

20.6%

20.6%

15.6%

20-21

13.3%

12.7%

13.0%

14.3%

18.2%

9.6%

22-23

4.0%

3.4%

3.7%

5.1%

3.9%

3.7%

24-25

3.7%

2.6%

4.6%

4.0%

4.8%

2.6%

26-27

1.0%

0.8%

0.7%

1.1%

1.9%

0.9%

28-29

0.8%

0.7%

1.0%

0.4%

0.9%

1.0%

30+

4.6%

4.2%

3.1%

6.2%

8.7%

2.0%

Overall, those who reported currently having lower income had a higher average age of smoking initiation. Average age at initiation did not vary significantly by education in the combined analysis, but did vary significantly in France and Sweden. Women in the younger age cohorts generally began smoking at a younger age than women in older age cohorts (Table 5). Linear regression analysis showed that, after controlling for reasons for starting smoking, age at initiation was significantly earlier among Swedish women (β -0.72, p = 0.02) than among French women, and significantly later among women from the Czech Republic (β 1.79, p < 0.0001) (Table 6). Women who started smoking because their friends smoked or to look 'cool' were more likely to start smoking at a younger age than those who did not cite these reasons. Women who smoked to manage stress or to feel less depressed were more likely to start at an older age (Table 6).

<p>Table 5</p>

Mean age at smoking initiation by income, education, and age, weighted.

All

(n = 2364)

France

(n = 461)

Ireland

(n = 515)

Italy

(n = 472)

Czech Republic

(n = 427)

Sweden

(n = 489)


Mean age at initiation

n

mean

n

mean

n

mean

n

mean

n

mean

n

mean


by current income

Well below the median

241

19.3

49

18.5

41

20.3

88

18.7

28

20.9

35

19.1

Below the median

591

18.3

114

17.8

144

17.9

143

18.3

92

21.1

98

17.0

Around the median

647

18.1

111

18.4

144

17.6

113

18.3

175

18.9

104

17.0

Above the median

400

17.7

79

18.4

107

17.4

41

18.6

71

18.7

102

16.6

Well above the median

79

17.9

14

20.0

11

19.6

4

22.8

4

17.3

46

16.6

Refused to answer

406

18.1

94

17.3

68

17.8

83

19.3

57

20.2

104

17.0

(ANOVA p-value)

(p = 0.0025)

(p = 0.0945)

(p = 0.0101)

(p = 0.4711)

(p = 0.0077)

(p = 0.0566)


by age at last education

<16

288

18.8

21

20.9

89

17.9

104

19.7

19

21.2

55

17.3

16-19

1052

18.0

165

18.2

278

18.0

175

18.1

228

19.7

206

16.3

20-25

713

18.2

214

18.0

112

17.8

140

18.3

138

19.1

109

17.7

>25

229

18.3

19

17.6

30

18.3

50

18.8

35

20.3

95

17.6

Missing

82

17.3

42

17.2

6

14.3

3

19.4

7

18.9

24

17.5

(ANOVA p-value)

(p = 0.0913)

(p = 0.0162)

(p = 0.9321)

(p = 0.0807)

(p = 0.3701)

(p = 0.0071)


by current age*

18-24

184

30

50

30

37

37

25-34

419

16.4

76

16.9

110

16.4

92

16.3

80

17.2

61

15.2

35-44

380

17.0

61

17.2

102

17.2

74

17.1

52

17.8

91

16.2

45-54

391

17.0

74

16.8

78

17.0

87

17.3

60

17.9

92

16.2

55+

743

17.6

179

17.7

129

17.6

136

17.9

122

18.5

177

16.9

(ANOVA p-value)

(p < 0.0001)

(p = 0.0002)

(p < 0.0001)

(p < 0.0001)

(p < 0.0001)

(p < 0.0001)

*excluding those who initiated after the age of 24 (n = 245)

<p>Table 6</p>

Linear regression of factors associated with age at smoking initiation.

β (95% CI)

p-value


Intercept

18.74 (18.20, 19.28)

<0.0001

Country

France

-

Ireland

0.22 (-0.38, 0.82)

0.47

Italy

0.54 (-0.06, 1.14)

0.08

Czech

1.79 (1.16, 2.41)

<0.0001

Sweden

-0.72 (-1.30, -0.14)

0.02

Reasons for initiation*

My friends smoked

-1.02 (-1.42, -0.61)

<0.0001

Smoking made me look more cool

-1.69 (-2.15, -1.23)

<0.0001

My friends approved of my smoking

-0.36 (-1.11, 0.39)

0.35

It helped me manage my stress

2.67 (1.88, 3.45)

<0.0001

My family members smoked

-0.20 (-0.98, 0.58)

0.61

I was not worried about health effects

0.41 (-0.63, 1.45)

0.44

I believed I could quit whenever I wanted to

-0.65 (-1.69, 0.39)

0.22

Tobacco advertising was attractive to me

0.67 (-0.79, 2.14)

0.37

Weight concerns

0.45 (-1.08, 1.99)

0.56

I was less depressed when I smoked

3.88 (2.33, 5.42)

<0.0001

My parents did not mind that I smoked

-0.95 (-3.27, 1.37)

0.42

*Respondents could choose more than one reason for initiation. Those who gave each reason were compared with those who did not.

Discussion

This study provides an overview of factors associated with women's smoking in five European countries at the beginning of a time of rapid change in tobacco policy. We found that friends exert a strong influence on a woman's decision to start smoking in all five countries, especially in younger women. This has been reported from previous studies based in Europe and in studies based in the United States, Iran, Thailand and Mexico 6789101112313233. We found that women in the Czech Republic and Sweden appeared to be more strongly influenced by friends and family smoking than in other countries.

We found that being divorced or separated is strongly associated with smoking, which has been reported previously 34. The association between divorce or separation and ever smoking appears to be strongest in Ireland and Italy, where rates of divorce and separation were lowest in our study sample. Our results also showed that in France, women who had never married were more likely to smoke than those who were married. Chaix and colleagues found similar results when they conducted a nationwide survey in France of 12 948 men and women 35.

Overall, we did not find a strong association between socioeconomic measures and smoking. This is in contrast to other findings on education status, low socioeconomic status (SES), and smoking initiation from Europe and other parts of the world 141516363738394041. Our null findings could have partly been due the way the data were collected. Instead of asking for what level of education had been achieved, participants were asked how old they were when they completed their education. As individuals can complete different levels of education at different ages, this may have made our education groups more similar in terms of actual education level and biased the results toward the null. Also, since income can be a sensitive topic, there may have been reporting bias. The distribution of income levels was not as we expected; there was a disproportionate number of Italian women who reported having income well below the median and a disproportionate number of Czech women who reported having income around the median. This may be an indication that the way the question was asked made the responses subjective. There was a considerable amount of variation in the response rate between countries. Only 41.4% of women in Italy and 30.6% of women in the Czech Republic contacted who were eligible for participation agreed to participate. This may be another reason why the income distribution for these two countries was skewed. Our null findings on socio-economic status and smoking initiation could have also been due to generational differences between the younger and older women. In younger women, less education has been found to be associated with ever smoking; however, education has been found to be less predictive for older age groups. The generational shift varies in different European countries, with larger inequalities in Northern Europe, and this could have also diluted our overall results 424344454647.

Alternatively, the null association between socioeconomic measures and ever smoking could in fact be accurate. Most studies investigating smoking initiation and socioeconomic factors look at populations that include both men and women. Women, however, may be less influenced by education and income status than men and more influenced by social factors such as friends and family. Many studies looking at SES and smoking status measure SES at the neighborhood level 14153638. Using neighborhood level data, rather than individual level data, may account for societal factors that may have a strong influence on women. One study showed that higher levels of smoking in deprived areas can only be partially explained by individual SES 15. Similarly, a study based in California found that the protective effects of individual SES may be reduced if an individual lives in a low SES neighborhood 36. Further investigation may provide interesting insight into what specific aspects of SES influence smoking in women.

As has been seen elsewhere 6789101112, friends smoking was the top reason given for smoking initiation. The second most common reason for initiation was to 'look cool'. Spijkerman and colleagues also found that smoking was associated with wanting to be cool, rebellious and attractive 48. Watson and colleagues found that smoking was accepted as part of a 'cool' image 49. Friends smoking and looking cool was especially important for the younger women in our study.

Over 80% of the smokers in our study started smoking by 20 years of age. Those who initiate smoking in adolescence are of particular concern. Adolescents are more susceptible to nicotine addiction and require a shorter duration of smoking and fewer cigarettes to become addicted 50. Furthermore, the earlier one starts smoking, the greater the cancer risk in middle and old age 5051. Average age at smoking initiation varied by country, income, education, and age cohort. Schulze and Mons also found mean age of smoking initiation differed by education level in Germany, and they found that the gap was widening among women 52. Consistent with our findings, La Vecchia et al. found that Italian women are initiating smoking at an earlier age than previous generations 53. Differences in age at initiation by country may be reflected in inter-country variation in lung cancer mortality by age 3.

We found depression to be associated with later smoking initiation. Since median age of onset of mood disorders, including major depressive disorder, ranges from 29 to 43 globally 54, it is not surprising that women who initiated smoking at a later age cited depression as a factor. In our study sample, 7.3% of women who started smoking at age 29 and older cited depression as a reason for initiating smoking compared to 1.2% in women who started smoking younger than 29 (p < 0.0001, data not shown). There is already much evidence linking depression and smoking 5556; however, there is some debate as to the direction of the causality 5758596061.

However, since depression was only evaluated by self-report, the definition of depression may have been used very broadly by the participants and it is difficult to make any specific clinical conclusions. It may be interesting for future studies to investigate if the relationship between depression and smoking differs by age at smoking initiation.

We found that individuals who stated they began smoking to reduce stress were more likely to have initiated at an older age. Other studies have found an association between stress and smoking 626364. Lloyd and Taylor found that the effect of former life stress predicts smoking independently of recent stress and that the effect of social stress on smoking is additive over time 65. In other words, stress at a younger age may affect future smoking; therefore, women who initiated smoking at a later age were more likely to cite stress as a factor.

One major limitation of the study was the stratified sampling approach using available telephone numbers. This method was chosen to allow the study to reach a large sample of women that was proportionally representative of smoking rates in each age group. However, administering the survey via telephone prevented us from verifying self-reported data. The potential for recall bias on reported age of initiation may have affected the accuracy of results. This bias was not likely to be differential by age group and thus should not affect the overall picture of the results. Also, since no mobile phone numbers were included in the phone list, the study could have excluded a substantial number of women from our study who may have unknown differences than those who could be reached by home telephone. Level of income and/or education may have affected whether women had a landline or whether they relied solely on cellular phone use. Thus, the participants may not be an accurate representation of their respective countries.

Though the five countries included in our study were at different stages of the tobacco epidemic 27 factors associated with smoking initiation were very similar. The association between friends and family smoking was found in all countries, but was strongest in Sweden and Czech Republic, two countries with very different tobacco epidemics. Mean age of smoking initiation was youngest in Sweden, which is in the more advanced stages of the tobacco epidemic. Mean age of initiation was oldest in the Czech Republic, which is in an earlier stage of the tobacco epidemic.

As rates of smoking are still rising among women in much of Europe, there is much to be done to prevent smoking-attributable mortality rates from also rising. The recent changes in Europe's tobacco policy have shown promising signs of slowing the epidemic. In a cross-sectional study of 18 European countries, countries with more developed tobacco control policies had higher levels of smoking cessation than in countries with less developed tobacco policies 66. In Ireland, Mullally et al. found a significant decline in cigarette consumption among bar workers and a significant drop in smoking prevalence in the general population one year after a nationwide ban on workplace smoking in March 2004 67. In Scotland, Fowkes et al. found that smoking quit rates increased in the three months prior to introduction of the Scottish smoke-free legislation in March 2006 68.

Conclusions

This study showed that among European women, friends are the primary factor influencing both ever smoking and smoking initiation, especially among young women. We also found that over 80% of European women begin smoking by the age of 20 and that average age of smoking initiation varies by country, income, and age cohort, with Swedish women most likely to start smoking at a young age. The results from this study may serve as a helpful baseline for future studies on the long-term effect of the recent European tobacco laws.

Competing interests

This research was funded by the European Union, in the framework of the Public Health Programme.

Authors' contributions

DLO analyzed the data and drafted the manuscript. JEH assisted in the design of the study and the statistical analysis. CD, SA, M Haglund, SSDM, EK, IS, ET, and ERG helped to draft the manuscript. M Hashibe conceived of the study, and participated in its design and coordination and helped to draft the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

This publication arises from the project Women in Europe Against Lung Cancer and Smoking (WELAS) which has received funding from the European Union, in the framework of the Public Health Programme. Debora L Oh worked on this project under the tenure of a special training award from the International Agency for Research on Cancer.

<p>Tobacco control database</p> WHO. Regional Office for Europe WHO 2008 <p>Patterns of global tobacco use in young people and implications for future chronic disease burden in adults</p> Warren CW Jones NR Eriksen MP Asma S The Lancet 2006 367 749 753 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68192-0 <p>Lung cancer mortality in European women: recent trends and perspectives</p> Bosetti C Levi F Lucchini F Negri E Vecchia CL Annals of Oncology 2005 16 1597 1604 10.1093/annonc/mdi313 16014639 <p>Smoking trends among adolescents from 1990 to 2002 in ten European countries and Canada</p> Hublet A De Bacquer D Valimaa R Godeau E Schmid H Rahav G Maes L BMC Public Health 2006 6 280 10.1186/1471-2458-6-280 1654156 17096837 <p>Convergence of male and female lung cancer mortality at younger ages in the European Union and Russia</p> Zatonski WA Manczuk M Powles J Negri E The European Journal of Public Health 2007 17 450 454 10.1093/eurpub/ckl276 <p>Psychosocial determinants of the onset and escalation of smoking: cross-sectional and prospective findings in multiethnic middle school samples</p> Carvajal SC Wiatrek DE Evans RI Knee CR Nash SG Journal of Adolescent Health 2000 27 255 265 10.1016/S1054-139X(00)00124-5 11008088 <p>Parents' and friends' smoking status as predictors of smoking onset: findings from six European countries</p> de Vries H Engels R Kremers S Wetzels J Mudde A Health Education Research 2003 18 627 636 10.1093/her/cyg032 14572021 <p>Predictors of smoking onset over two years</p> Forrester K Biglan A Severson HH Smolkowski K Nicotine & Tobacco Research 2007 9 1259 1267 10.1080/14622200701705357 <p>Psychosocial correlates of substance use in adolescence: A cross-national study in six European countries</p> Kokkevi A Richardson C Florescu S Kuzman M Stergar E Drug and Alcohol Dependence 2007 86 67 74 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2006.05.018 16837140 <p>Further investigation of psychological and environmental correlates of substance use in adolescence in six European countries</p> Kokkevi AE Arapaki AA Richardson C Florescu S Kuzman M Stergar E Drug and Alcohol Dependence 2007 88 308 312 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2006.10.004 17113243 <p>Perceived smoking environment and smoking initiation among multi-ethnic urban girls</p> Nichols TR Birnbaum AS Birnel S Botvin GJ Journal of Adolescent Health 2006 38 369 375 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2005.04.016 16549297 <p>Age-related differences in factors associated with smoking initiation</p> Wilkinson A Schabath M Prokhorov A Spitz M Cancer Causes and Control 2007 18 635 644 10.1007/s10552-007-9008-6 17473909 <p>Predictors of susceptibility to smoking and ever smoking: A longitudinal study in a triethnic sample of adolescents</p> Gritz ER Prokhorov AV Hudmon KS Jones MM Rosenblum C Chung-Chi C Chamberlain RM Taylor WC Johnston D de Moor C Nicotine & Tobacco Research 2003 5 493 10.1080/1462220031000118568 <p>Neighbourhood socioeconomic status and cardiovascular risk factors: a multilevel analysis of nine cities in the Czech Republic and Germany</p> Dragano N Bobak M Wege N Peasey A Verde P Kubinova R Weyers S Moebus S Mohlenkamp S Stang A Erbel R Jockel KH Siegrist J Pikhart H BMC Public Health 2007 7 255 10.1186/1471-2458-7-255 2099437 17888149 <p>The impact of individual and area characteristics on urban socioeconomic differences in health and smoking</p> Reijneveld SA Int J Epidemiol 1998 27 33 40 10.1093/ije/27.1.33 9563691 <p>New smokers and quitters: Transitions in smoking status in a national population</p> Willemsen MC Hoogenveen RT Lucht van der F The European Journal of Public Health 2002 12 136 138 10.1093/eurpub/12.2.136 <p>Tobacco Promotion and the Initiation of Tobacco Use: Assessing the Evidence for Causality</p> DiFranza JR Wellman RJ Sargent JD Weitzman M Hipple BJ Winickoff JP for the Tobacco Consortium CfCHRotAAoP Pediatrics 2006 117 e1237 1248 10.1542/peds.2005-1817 16740823 <p>Smoking, social class, and gender: what can public health learn from the tobacco industry about disparities in smoking?</p> Barbeau EM Leavy-Sperounis A Balbach ED Tob Control 2004 13 115 120 10.1136/tc.2003.006098 1747877 15175523 <p>The Modified Reasons for Smoking Scale: factorial structure, gender effects and relationship with nicotine dependence and smoking cessation in French smokers</p> Berlin I Singleton EG Pedarriosse A Lancrenon S Rames A Aubin H Niaura R Addiction 2003 98 1575 1583 10.1046/j.1360-0443.2003.00523.x 14616184 <p>Why nurses smoke: a review of the literature</p> Rowe K Macleod Clark J International Journal of Nursing Studies 2000 37 173 181 10.1016/S0020-7489(99)00060-7 10684959 <p>Perceived importance of being thin and smoking initiation among young girls</p> Honjo K Siegel M Tobacco Control 2003 12 289 295 10.1136/tc.12.3.289 1747738 12958390 <p>Weight concerns, dieting behavior, and smoking initiation among adolescents: a prospective study</p> French SA Perry CL Leon GR Fulkerson JA American Journal of Public Health 1994 84 1818 1820 10.2105/AJPH.84.11.1818 1615224 7977924 <p>Predictors of regular cigarette smoking among adolescent females: Does body image matter?</p> Kaufman AR Augustson EM Nicotine & Tobacco Research 2008 10 1301 1309 10.1080/14622200802238985 <p>Ethnic variation in the association between weight concern and adolescent smoking</p> Weiss JW Merrill V Gritz ER Addictive Behaviors 2007 32 2311 2316 10.1016/j.addbeh.2007.01.020 17307301 <p>Lung cancer and cigarette smoking in Europe: An update of risk estimates and an assessment of inter-country heterogeneity</p> Simonato L Agudo A Ahrens W Benhamou E Benhamou S Bofetta P Brennan P Darby SC Forastiere F International Journal of Cancer 2001 91 876 887 10.1002/1097-0215(200102)9999:9999<::AID-IJC1139>3.0.CO;2-7 <p>Mortality from smoking in developed countries 1950-2000 (European Union - 25 countries)</p> Peto R Alan D Lopez Jillian Boreham Thun M 2006 http://www.ctsu.ox.ac.uk/~tobacco/SMK_All_PAGES.pdf <p>Going up or coming down? The changing phases of the lung cancer epidemic from 1967 to 1999 in the 15 European Union countries</p> Bray F Tyczynski JE Parkin DM European Journal of Cancer 2004 40 96 125 10.1016/j.ejca.2003.08.005 14687795 <p>Trends in lung cancer among young European women: The rising epidemic in France and Spain</p> Levi F Bosetti C Fernandez F Hill C Lucchini F Negri E La Vecchia C International Journal of Cancer 2007 121 462 465 10.1002/ijc.22694 <p>The Tobacco Control Scale: a new scale to measure country activity</p> Joossens L Raw M Tobacco Control 2006 15 247 253 10.1136/tc.2005.015347 2564668 16728757 <p>Home and workplace smoking bans in Italy, Ireland, Sweden, France, and the Czech Republic</p> Heck JE Stucker I Allwright S Gritz ER Haglund M Healton CG Kralikova E Sanchez Del Mazo S Tamang E Dresler CM Hashibe M Eur Respir J 19926747 <p>Determinants of tobacco use among youths in Isfahan, Iran</p> Kelishadi R Mokhtari M Tavasoli A Khosravi A hangar-Nazari I Sabet B Kazemi A Amini A International Journal of Public Health 2007 52 173 179 10.1007/s00038-007-6017-x 17958284 <p>Factores asociados a los patrones de consumo de tabaco en adolescentes escolares. (Spanish)</p> Nuno-Gutierrez BL Alvarez-Nemegyei J Madrigal-De Leon EA Tapia-Curiel A Revista Medica del IMSS 2008 46 19 26 <p>Correlates of cigarette smoking among school-going adolescents in Thailand: findings from the Thai global youth tobacco survey 2005</p> Rudatsikira E Muula A Siziya S Mataya R International Archives of Medicine 2008 1 8 10.1186/1755-7682-1-8 2435109 18547434 <p>Marital Status and Twins' Health and Behavior: An Analysis of Middle-Aged Danish Twins</p> Osler M McGue M Lund R Christensen K Psychosomatic Medicine 2008 70 482 487 10.1097/PSY.0b013e31816f857b 18480194 <p>A multilevel analysis of tobacco use and tobacco consumption levels in France. Are there any combination risk groups?</p> Chaix B Guilbert P Chauvin P The European Journal of Public Health 2004 14 186 190 10.1093/eurpub/14.2.186 <p>Effects of neighbourhood socioeconomic status and convenience store concentration on individual level smoking</p> Chuang YC Cubbin C Ahn D Winkleby MA Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 2005 59 568 573 10.1136/jech.2004.029041 1757087 15965140 <p>Differences in prevalence of tobacco use among Indian urban youth: The role of socioeconomic status</p> Mathur C Stigler MH Perry CL Arora M Reddy KS Nicotine & Tobacco Research 2008 10 109 116 10.1080/14622200701767779 <p>Socioeconomic disadvantage and changes in health risk behaviours in Australia: 1989-90 to 2001</p> Najman JM Toloo G Siskind V Bulletin of the World Health Organization 2006 84 976 984 10.2471/BLT.05.028928 2627564 17242834 <p>Influence of Life Course Socioeconomic Position on Older Women's Health Behaviors: Findings From the British Women's Heart and Health Study</p> Watt HC Carson C Lawlor DA Patel R Ebrahim S Am J Public Health 2009 99 320 327 10.2105/AJPH.2007.129288 19059863 <p>Socioeconomic correlates of smoking among an ethnically diverse sample of 8th grade adolescents in Southern California</p> Unger JB Sun P Johnson CA Preventive Medicine 2007 44 323 327 10.1016/j.ypmed.2006.12.018 1904430 17303234 <p>Socioeconomic differences in smoking trends among pregnant women at first antenatal visit in Sweden 1982-2001: Increasing importance of educational level for the total burden of smoking</p> Moussa KM Ostergren PO Grahn M Kunst AE Eek F Essen B Tob Control 2008 tc.2008.026336 18974226 <p>Inequalities in the prevalence of smoking in the European Union: comparing education and income</p> Huisman M Kunst AE Mackenbach JP Prev Med 2005 40 756 764 10.1016/j.ypmed.2004.09.022 15850876 <p>Educational inequalities in smoking among men and women aged 16 years and older in 11 European countries</p> Huisman M Kunst AE Mackenbach JP Tob Control 2005 14 106 113 10.1136/tc.2004.008573 1748002 15791020 <p>Monitoring of socio-economic inequalities in smoking: learning from the experiences of recent scientific studies</p> Schaap MM Kunst AE Public Health 2009 123 103 109 10.1016/j.puhe.2008.10.015 19147163 <p>Identification of socioeconomic groups at increased risk for smoking in European countries: looking beyond educational level</p> Schaap MM van Agt HM Kunst AE Nicotine Tob Res 2008 10 359 369 10.1080/14622200701825098 18236301 <p>Trends in smoking behaviour between 1985 and 2000 in nine European countries by education</p> Giskes K Kunst AE Benach J Borrell C Costa G Dahl E Dalstra JA Federico B Helmert U Judge K Lahelma E Moussa K Ostergren PO Platt S Prattala R Rasmussen NK Mackenbach JP J Epidemiol Community Health 2005 59 395 401 10.1136/jech.2004.025684 1733079 15831689 <p>Educational differences in smoking: international comparison</p> Cavelaars AE Kunst AE Geurts JJ Crialesi R Grotvedt L Helmert U Lahelma E Lundberg O Matheson J Mielck A Rasmussen NK Regidor E do Rosario-Giraldes M Spuhler T Mackenbach JP BMJ 2000 320 1102 1107 10.1136/bmj.320.7242.1102 27351 10775217 <p>Self-comparison processes, prototypes, and smoking onset among early adolescents</p> Spijkerman R Eijnden van den RJJM Engels RCME Preventive Medicine 2005 40 785 794 10.1016/j.ypmed.2004.09.025 15850880 <p>Filthy or fashionable? Young people's perceptions of smoking in the media</p> Watson NA Clarkson JP Donovan RJ Giles-Corti B Health Education Research 2003 18 554 567 10.1093/her/cyf039 14572016 <p>Youth Tobacco Use: A Global Perspective for Child Health Care Clinicians</p> Prokhorov AV Winickoff JP Ahluwalia JS Ossip-Klein D Tanski S Lando HA Moolchan ET Muramoto M Klein JD Weitzman M Ford KH for the Tobacco Consortium AAoPCfCHR Pediatrics 2006 118 e890 e903 10.1542/peds.2005-0810 16950972 <p>Tobacco smoking and cancer: a brief review of recent epidemiological evidence</p> Sasco AJ Secretan MB Straif K Lung Cancer 2004 45 S3 S9 10.1016/j.lungcan.2004.07.998 15552776 <p>The evolution of educational inequalities in smoking: a changing relationship and a cross-over effect among German birth cohorts of 1921-70</p> Schulze A Mons U Addiction 2006 101 1051 1056 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2006.01458.x 16771897 <p>Patterns of Smoking Initiation in Italian Males and Females from 1955 to 1985</p> Lavecchia C Decarli A Pagano R Preventive Medicine 1995 24 293 296 10.1006/pmed.1995.1047 7644453 <p>Lifetime prevalence and age-of-onset distributions of mental disorders in the World Health Organization's World Mental Health Survey Initiative</p> Kessler RC Angermeyer M Anthony JC De Graff R Demyttenaere K Gasquet I World Psychiatry 2007 6 168 176 2174588 18188442 <p>Depressive mood, the single-parent home, and adolescent cigarette smoking</p> Covey LS Tam D American Journal of Public Health 1990 80 1330 1333 10.2105/AJPH.80.11.1330 1404887 2240299 <p>The relationship between depressive symptoms and cigarette smoking in US adolescents</p> Escobedo LG Reddy M Giovino GA Addiction 1998 93 433 10.1046/j.1360-0443.1998.93343311.x 10328050 <p>Is the smoking-depression relationship confounded by alcohol consumption? An analysis by gender</p> Massak A Graham K Nicotine & Tobacco Research 2008 10 1231 1243 10.1080/14622200802163449 <p>Major Depression and Stages of Smoking: A Longitudinal Investigation</p> Breslau N Peterson EL Schultz LR Chilcoat HD Andreski P Archives of General Psychiatry 1998 55 161 166 10.1001/archpsyc.55.2.161 9477930 <p>Tobacco smoking as a risk factor for major depressive disorder: population-based study</p> Pasco JA Williams LJ Jacka FN Ng F Henry MJ Nicholson GC Kotowicz MA Berk M The British Journal of Psychiatry 2008 193 322 326 10.1192/bjp.bp.107.046706 18827296 <p>Adolescent smoking and depression: Which comes first?</p> Steuber TL Danner F Addictive Behaviors 2006 31 133 136 10.1016/j.addbeh.2005.04.010 15922514 <p>Psychiatric disorders and stages of smoking</p> Breslau N Novak SP Kessler RC Biological Psychiatry 2004 55 69 76 10.1016/S0006-3223(03)00317-2 14706427 <p>Adolescents becoming smokers: the roles of stress and coping methods</p> Siqueira L Diab M Bodian C Rolnitzky L Journal of Adolescent Health 2000 27 399 408 10.1016/S1054-139X(00)00167-1 11090742 <p>Smoking, stress, and negative affect: correlation, causation, and context across stages of smoking</p> Kassel Jd Stroud LR Paronis CA Psychological Bulletin 2003 129 270 304 10.1037/0033-2909.129.2.270 12696841 <p>Adverse Childhood Experiences and Smoking During Adolescence and Adulthood</p> Anda RF Croft JB Felitti VJ Nordenberg D Giles WH Williamson DF Giovino GA JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association 1999 282 1652 1658 10.1001/jama.282.17.1652 10553792 <p>Lifetime cumulative adversity, mental health and the risk of becoming a smoker</p> Lloyd DA Taylor J Health 2006 10 95 112 10.1177/1363459306058990 16322045 <p>Effect of nationwide tobacco control policies on smoking cessation in high and low educated groups in 18 European countries</p> Schaap MM Kunst AE Leinsalu M Regidor E Ekholm O Dzurova D Helmert U Klumbiene J Santana P Mackenbach JP Tobacco Control 2008 17 248 255 10.1136/tc.2007.024265 18483129 <p>The effect of the Irish smoke-free workplace legislation on smoking among bar workers</p> Mullally BJ Greiner BA Allwright S Paul G Perry IJ Eur J Public Health 2009 19 206 211 10.1093/eurpub/ckp008 19307250 <p>Scottish smoke-free legislation and trends in smoking cessation</p> Fowkes FJI Marlene CW Stewart F Gerald R Fowkes Amanda Amos Price JF Addiction 2008 103 1888 1895 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2008.02350.x 19032538

Pre-publication history

The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:

http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/10/74/prepub