s'authentifier
version française rss feed
Information and decision-making process for selective termination of dichorionic pregnancies: some French obstetricians' points of view.
Legendre C.-M., Hervé C., Goussot-Souchet M., Bouffard C., Moutel G.
Prenatal Diagnosis 29, 1 (2009) 89-94 - http://www.hal.inserm.fr/inserm-00415331
 (19101926) 
Information and decision-making process for selective termination of dichorionic pregnancies: some French obstetricians' points of view.
Claire-Marie Legendre1, Christian Hervé2, Michèle Goussot-Souchet2, Chantal Bouffard () 1, Grégoire Moutel () 2
1 :  Service de génétique, Département de pédiatrie
Université de Sherbrooke
Faculté de médecine et des sciences de la santé, 3001 12th Avenue North, Sherbrooke, QC J1H 5N4
Canada
2 :  LEM - Laboratoire d'éthique médicale et médecine légale
Réseau Inserm de Recherche en éthique médicale – Université Paris V - Paris Descartes
Faculté de médecine, 45 rue des Saints-Pères, Paris 75006
France
BACKGROUND: In France, neither Bioethics Law nor law related to abortion make reference to selective terminations (ST). Because they apply in the context of multiple pregnancies, ST raises problems which differ from those we usually see in prenatal medicine.We wanted to know: 1) which approaches were used by obstetricians to inform couples about processes and risks of ST, 2) their role in the decision-making process of couples, and 3) their representations about the level of autonomy that couples are able to assume. METHODS: Qualitative research, eight semi-structured interviews performed with eight obstetricians from seven public hospitals in Parisian region. RESULTS: Similarities: *Necessity to devote a lot of time to information. *Importance to give the couples the maximum of time for reflection. *Belief that the final decision belongs to couples. Discordances: *Heterogeneity of revealed information. *Discrepancy in the will to assure a complete and non directive information transfer. *Divergence in representations of what is an ethical support. *Differences in the limits of the autonomy of couples. CONCLUSIONS: All physicians believe that they respect the autonomy of couples, arguing that final decision belongs to them. Paradoxically, some results are indicative of a sizeable level of directiveness from the physicians.
Sciences du Vivant/Ethique
Sciences du Vivant/Médecine humaine et pathologie/Gynécologie et obstétrique
Anglais
0197-3851

Articles dans des revues avec comité de lecture
10.1002/pd.2174
Prenatal Diagnosis (Prenat Diagn)
Publisher Wiley-Blackwell
ISSN 0197-3851 (eISSN : 1097-0223)
internationale
01/2009
29
1
89-94

Attitude of Health Personnel – Decision Making – Female – France – Humans – Interviews as Topic – Physician-Patient Relations – Placenta – Pregnancy – Pregnancy Reduction – Multifetal – Prenatal Care – Prenatal Diagnosis – Twins – Monozygotic
Liste des fichiers attachés à ce document : 
DOC
Legendre_et_al.doc(79.5 KB)
PDF
Legendre_et_al.pdf(156 KB)
inserm-00415331_edited.pdf(128.7 KB)
XHTML
index.xhtml(48.9 KB)

tous les articles de la base du CCSd...