s'authentifier
version française rss feed
Breast cancer risk in relation to different types of hormone replacement therapy in the E3N-EPIC cohort.
Fournier A., Berrino F., Riboli E., Avenel V., Clavel-Chapelon F.
Int J Cancer 114, 3 (2005) 448-54 - http://www.hal.inserm.fr/inserm-00129104/fr/
(15856459)
Breast cancer risk in relation to different types of hormone replacement therapy in the E3N-EPIC cohort.
Agnès Fournier1, Franco Berrino2, Elio Riboli3, 4, Valérie Avenel1, Françoise Clavel-Chapelon () 1, 5
1 :  E3N - Nutrition, hormones et cancer: épidémiologie et prévention
http://www.idf.inserm.fr/site/eri20/
INSERM : ERI20 – IFR69 – Université Paris XI - Paris Sud : EA4045
Institut Gustave-Roussy 39 rue Camille Desmoulins 94805 Villejuif CEDEX
France
2 :  Department of Preventive and Predictive Medicine
Istituto Nazionale Tumori
Milan
Italie
3 :  Unit of Nutrition and Cancer
International Agency for Research on Cancer
150, cours Albert Thomas 69372 Lyon cedex 08
France
4 :  Nutrition and Hormone Group
International Agency for Research on Cancer
Lyon
France
5 :  Epidémiologie des cancers
INSERM : U521
Institut Gustave Roussy Villejuif
France
Most epidemiological studies have shown an increase in breast cancer risk related to hormone replacement therapy (HRT) use. A recent large cohort study showed effects of similar magnitude for different types of progestogens and for different routes of administration of estrogens evaluated. Further investigation of these issues is of importance. We assessed the risk of breast cancer associated with HRT use in 54,548 postmenopausal women who had never taken any HRT 1 year before entering the E3N-EPIC cohort study (mean age at inclusion: 52.8 years); 948 primary invasive breast cancers were diagnosed during follow-up (mean duration: 5.8 years). Data were analyzed using multivariate Cox proportional hazards models. In this cohort where the mean duration of HRT use was 2.8 years, an increased risk in HRT users compared to nonusers was found (relative risk (RR) 1.2 [95% confidence interval 1.1-1.4]). The RR was 1.1 [0.8-1.6] for estrogens used alone and 1.3 [1.1-1.5] when used in combination with oral progestogens. The risk was significantly greater (p <0.001) with HRT containing synthetic progestins than with HRT containing micronized progesterone, the RRs being 1.4 [1.2-1.7] and 0.9 [0.7-1.2], respectively. When combined with synthetic progestins, both oral and transdermal/percutaneous estrogens use were associated with a significantly increased risk; for transdermal/percutaneous estrogens, this was the case even when exposure was less than 2 years. Our results suggest that, when combined with synthetic progestins, even short-term use of estrogens may increase breast cancer risk. Micronized progesterone may be preferred to synthetic progestins in short-term HRT. This finding needs further investigation.
Sciences du Vivant/Santé publique et épidémiologie
Sciences du Vivant/Cancérologie
Sciences du Vivant/Médecine humaine et pathologie/Gynécologie et obstétrique
Anglais
0020-7136

Articles dans des revues avec comité de lecture
10.1002/ijc.20710
Int J Cancer
10/04/2005
114
3
448-54

Adult – Aged – 80 and over – Breast Neoplasms – Drug Administration Schedule – Epidemiologic Studies – Estrogens – Female – France – Hormone Replacement Therapy – Humans – Incidence – Middle Aged – Odds Ratio – Progestins – Risk Factors – Adult – 80 and
The E3N study is supported by grants from the French League against Cancer, the European Community, the 3M Company, the Mutuelle Générale de l'Education Nationale, the Institut Gustave-Roussy and the Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale.
Liste des fichiers attachés à ce document : 
DOC
THS-IntJCancer.doc(138 KB)
PDF
THS-IntJCancer.pdf(304.9 KB)

tous les articles de la base du CCSd...